Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (212467)	12/1/2004 3:34:39 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573824

IIRC, Clinton kept America's role in the war at 10,000 feet. It seemed like a wise approach...turned out to be that way. As it worked out, we were able to do Kosovo with minimal loss of life. In fact, not a single American was killed there. Kosovo is not indicative of other, more complex conflicts. I know. It's just that everyone is talking about Bush supposedly invading Iran, when we haven't even dropped one bomb on that nation yet. Not me. Mindweld suggested that it was next. I happen to think that bush will not do much about iran. Maybe I am an optimist. Al

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (212467)	12/2/2004 9:46:39 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Respond to of 1573824

You probably already know that we cannot bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. They have removed the assets and just shrugged their shoulders when IAEC inspectors inquired what had happened to them. One popular rumor is that a suburb of Tehran now hosts many subterranean bunkers used in their nuclear weapons program. We are trying to revise a current nuclear bomb for deep subterranean penetration / bunker destruction. You cannot bomb what you cannot find. Much of what we know today came because of a walk in who dropped a hundred pages of documents on us. When will that next occur? Peter