Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (90261)	12/1/2004 3:00:45 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Yes, we'll never agree. And I've often wondered whether if you had ever talked to Poet's husband, and were more aware of the effect on her and him of that stalking, those threats, and understood that PTSD is a real thing, and that the victims of bullies really do suffer, have to go to doctors, and in this case to a lawyer, whether you would have continued to insist that as long as the lawsuit-threat of CH's enabled him to threaten her with posting "intimate" exchanges, and stalk her from SI to IHub, he should be treated with respect while doing it. As to the second part of that post, I've already answered it: I would be aghast if my PM's were made public. You know how I felt when a phone conversation I had that I asked be kept private was revealed to you. Betrayed. By someone I considered a friend. Especially when you used that information in a public argument (though falsely implying it was more than one phonecall). Think about how that made me feel. But if I announce that my PM's are transparent, there's nothing in them but what can be seen, then anyone is free to post them.