Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (212496)	12/2/2004 3:52:31 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574681

You perceive that because you either pretend to be ignorant of any facts that are not spinning wildly to the left, or you honestly cannot perceive the same. Whatever. Not one of your more brilliant responses. It is however predictable. You clearly disregard opinions and news sources that are not biased liberal. You prove this later in this discussion. I have followed both the right wing media and the mainstream media for the past 4 years. With the notable exception of the NRO, most right wing media exaggerate, misconstrue or blatantly lie about events. After all, it was FOX News who repeatedly announced breaking news, trumpeting the 'discovery' of WMDs in Iraq. The mainstream media may not always get it right but their accuracy is much better. Add the extraordinary bias of conservative media to their misrepresentations, and you have publications that are not much better than yellow rags. At times, its shocking how illegitimate their presentations are. Since I know you do not agree, I chose to say "whatever". I am tired of arguing the point. And he said it was wrong. Please show me where Kerry said that his act of murdering a wounded Vietnamese was wrong. All I ever noticed was the Kerry camp and their FMSM allies attacking those who brought the incident to light. There are reams of congressional testimony made by Kerry from the 1970s. Do a google.....you will find it. Your statements have given me an impression that is not easily reconciled with the fist part of that statement. We should be, as should all first world people, held to a higher standard. That means when the Administrator of the UN Oil for Terrorism scandal is on the take, it is a bad thing. It means when France, Germany, Russia, and China form the coalition of the coerced and the bribed, it is disgraceful. aina.org; Your attack of France and Germany would be reasonable if the US were clean as a whistle in this and other international matters. But we are not; in fact, we live in a glass house. The right practices a very powerful double standard; do not as we do but do as we say. Well, apparently, Germ. and Fra. feel what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Equivalent does not reconcile with Intellectually, Kerry ... could run circles around Mr. Bush. He can and he did. Did you not watch the debates? The only news channel that has such a definitive bias is Fox News. That is an obviously innacurate statement. No discussion of value can be made on falsehoods. But for the sake of arguement. The five liberal FMSM all endorsed and supported Kerry. He lost the popular vote. Proof of bias. Fox did not endorse either; the election was close; proof of lack of bias. When do news channels endorse a candidate? I thought only newspapers do that. Link please. Just follow the discussion back. This time read the posts. For the sake of making it easy to find: Hundreds of Veterans in a position to know have charged Kerry with being unfit for command. A few supported Kerry. Investors play the odds. You may prefer gambling to investing. The "few" [as you put it] that supported him includes those on his ship. For me, that speaks volumes.