SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (88473)12/2/2004 11:52:40 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
United States of America
Before the
Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities Act of 1933
Release No. 8311 / October 23, 2003
Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-11313

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the Matter of

Energy & Engine Technology Corporation and ProActive Computer Services, Inc.,

Respondent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: ORDER INSTITUTING PUBLIC CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS AND IMPOSING A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 8A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

I.
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate that public cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") against Energy & Engine Technology Corporation ("Energy & Engine") and ProActive Computer Services, Inc. ("ProActive") (collectively "Respondents").

II.
In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers of Settlement (the "Offers") which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission's jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Order"), as set forth below.

III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents' Offers, the Commission finds1 that:

FACTUAL SUMMARY
1. This matter involves a common abuse found among certain small publicly held companies. In recent years, many such companies have hired stock promoters to tout their shares on stock-picking websites and through mass-mailed e-mail messages (commonly known as "spam"). The promoter is often compensated in the form of purportedly unrestricted shares of the company's common stock, which the promoter sells after its touting has attracted investor interest in the company.

2. Under the federal securities laws, a public company cannot distribute unrestricted stock to ublic investors without first registering the offering with the Commission or having a valid exemption from registration for the transaction. Registration requires a company to provide important information about its finances and business to potential investors, and allows the Commission to review the company's disclosures. In an attempt to circumvent those registration requirements, certain issuers have sought alternate sources of purportedly "free trading" company stock in order to compensate the stock promoters. In such arrangements, the issuers and promoters are nonetheless participating in an unregistered offering of securities to the public in violation of the federal securities laws, as described below.

RESPONDENTS
3. Energy & Engine, a Nevada corporation headquartered in Plano, Texas, maintains a natural gas gathering system. Energy & Engine's common stock is registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), and is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol EENT.

4. ProActive, a Nevada corporation based in Houston, Texas, provides computer services to small and medium-sized businesses. ProActive's common stock is not registered with the Commission, and is quoted in the Pink Sheets under the symbol PAVP.

OTHER RELEVANT PERSONS
5. MicroCap Marketing, Inc. ("MicroCap Marketing") an Illinois corporation, promotes small cap companies on several websites it operates, including MicroCapMarketing.com, HotOTCStockPicks.com, and PennyGems.com, and in an electronic newsletter, Hot OTC Stock Picks.

6. Shane M. Nelson ("Nelson"), 29, of Bethany, Illinois, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of MicroCap Marketing.

7. Harold Engel, Jr. ("Engel"), 51, of Vancouver, Washington, promotes small cap stocks on his website, WillyWizard.com.

8. Lorsin, Inc. ("Lorsin") is a Florida corporation that promotes small cap companies on its website, GreedOrFear.com.

9. Loretta M. Lockhart ("Lockhart"), 30, of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina, is the sole officer and director of Lorsin.

10. Craig K. Hjalmarson (Hjalmarson"), 31, of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina, manages Lorsin and operates the GreedOrFear.com website.

11. George R. Siembida ("Siembida"), 55, of Depew, New York, ran a financial consulting and stock promotion business from approximately 1998 through 2002 under the name Russell Management, Inc.

12. Russell Management, Inc. ("Russell Management") is a private, New York corporation controlled by Siembida.

THE UNREGISTERED DISTRIBUTION OF ENERGY & ENGINE SECURITIES
13. In January 2002, Energy & Engine filed a Form S-8 Registration Statement for the proposed offering of up to 1,000,000 common shares of stock ("Energy & Engine S-8 shares"). The Form S-8 permitted Energy & Engine to issue unrestricted stock to certain employees and consultants. However, under the Securities Act (and as stated in the instructions to Form S-8), Energy & Engine could not use this Form S-8 to issue unrestricted stock to stock promoters.

14. Energy & Engine then hired Siembida and his company, Russell Management, to promote the company on the Internet. To pay for these services, Energy & Engine issued to Siembida 200,000 Energy & Engine S-8 shares on January 10, 2002.

15. Siembida subcontracted with Engel, who operates a stock picking website, WillyWizard.com, to promote Energy & Engine. To compensate Engel, Siembida transferred 185,000 of his Energy & Engine S-8 shares to Engel on January 18, 2002.

16. Engel, in turn, subcontracted with Lorsin's Hjalmarson to profile Energy & Engine on the website Hjalmarson operated, GreedOrFear.com. Engel also hired Nelson to profile Energy & Engine on the websites Nelson operated under the MicroCap Marketing name.

17. On January 25, 2002, Engel transferred a portion of his Energy & Engine S-8 shares to Hjalmarson and Nelson to pay for their promotional efforts. Hjalmarson's shares were deposited into a brokerage account in the name of Lorsin, and in which Hjalmarson was authorized to trade. Nelson's shares were deposited into his personal brokerage account.

18. By January 18, 2002, Engel had posted a profile touting Energy & Engine on his website, WillyWizard.com.

19. Nelson posted on his PennyGems.com website a profile touting Energy & Engine on or about January 21, 2002. Hjalmarson, who operated Lorsin, distributed to subscribers of Lorsin's GreedOrFear.com stock-promotion website an Energy & Engine press release on or about January 23, 2002.

20. From January 16, 2002 through January 24, 2002, and while Energy & Engine's stock was being promoted on the Internet, the price of Energy & Engine's stock rose 68 percent, from $0.29 to $0.49 per share, on average daily trading volume that was 659 percent higher than that of the preceding six months.

21. Following the promotional efforts described above, Engel, Hjalmarson, Nelson, and Siembida sold their Energy & Engine S-8 shares on the open market for $8,167.50, $998, $2,042, and $3,390.40, respectively.

22. Although certain issuers may register a securities offering under particular circumstances using the simplified procedure offered by Form S-8, such registration is not available for securities offered as compensation for stock promotion services. The transaction in which Energy & Engine issued shares to Siembida was not eligible for Form S-8 registration.

23. No applicable registration statement was filed with the Commission or was in effect as to the Energy & Engine shares sold by Siembida, Engel, Hjalmarson, and Nelson. Because Siembida obtained the stock from the issuer in an unregistered offering with a view to distributing the stock to the public, Siembida was an underwriter, as defined by the Securities Act, in this public distribution of Energy & Engine stock. Engel, Hjalmarson, and Nelson, who participated in this distribution, also could not sell their stock to the public unless the sales were registered. Therefore, the sales of Energy & Engine stock by Siembida, Engel, Hjalmarson, and Nelson violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.

THE UNREGISTERED DISTRIBUTION OF PROACTIVE SECURITIES
24. In March 2001, ProActive, through its president, hired Nelson to promote the company. ProActive agreed to compensate Nelson for its services with a combination of restricted and purportedly unrestricted ProActive shares. Nelson signed the agreement with ProActive on behalf of his company, MicroCap Marketing.

25. ProActive arranged for a third-party shareholder to transfer 300,000 shares of ProActive stock to Nelson's personal brokerage account. Nelson realized that an issuer cannot provide unrestricted stock directly without registering the transaction.

26. In early March 2002, Nelson began the ProActive campaign by posting profiles of ProActive on MicroCap Marketing's websites and touting the stock in his electronic newsletter.

27. Nelson sold the ProActive shares shortly after he received them from the third-party shareholder on the open market for $1,340.50.

28. No registration statement was filed with the Commission or was in effect as to the ProActive shares sold by Nelson. Because he obtained the stock from a person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by ProActive, or under direct or indirect common control with ProActive, with a view to distributing the stock to the public, the stock was not exempt from registration. As a result, the securities were restricted and could not be sold to the public within a year after they were acquired by Nelson. Therefore, the securities transactions described above violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.

VIOLATIONS
29. As a result of the conduct described above, Respondents violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, which prohibit the offer or sale of securities through the mails or in interstate commerce, unless a registration statement has been filed or is in effect as to such securities.

IV.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate to impose the sanctions specified in Respondents' Offers.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondents cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.

By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz

Secretary

Endnote
1 The findings herein are made pursuant to Respondents' Offers and are not binding on any other person or entity in this or any other proceeding.



sec.gov



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (88473)12/2/2004 11:54:08 AM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 43713 / December 12, 2000

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-10386

In the Matter of
Michael T. Fearnow d/b/a Financial Broker
Relations, and Focus Tech Investments, Inc.

Respondent.
Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15(b)(4) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order

I.

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") deems it appropriate and in the public interest that public administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings be instituted pursuant to Sections 15(b)(4) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against Respondents Michael T. Fearnow, d/b/a Financial Broker Relations, and Focus Tech Investments, Inc. (together "Respondents").

In anticipation of the institution of these administrative proceedings, Respondents have submitted a joint Offer of Settlement ("Offer"), which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purposes of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission or in which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except for those findings contained in paragraphs II. A. and B. below and the jurisdiction of the Commission over them and over the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, Respondents have consented to the entry of the findings and the imposition of the remedial sanctions and cease-and-desist order as set forth below.

II.

On the basis of this Order and the Offer submitted by each Respondent, the Commission makes the following findings:

A. Michael T. Fearnow, ("Fearnow") d/b/a Financial Broker Relations ("FBR"), age 55, of

Montgomery, Texas, performs financial consulting and investor relations services. Fearnow also owns and operates Focus Tech Investments, Inc. From 1973 to 1989, Fearnow was a registered representative associated with various broker-dealers. In 1989, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD") revoked Fearnow's registration.

B. Focus Tech Investments, Inc. ("Focus Tech") is a Delaware corporation located in Montgomery, Texas. Focus Tech is an investment consulting firm owned and operated by Fearnow.

C. Fearnow created and maintains a website entitled Financial Broker Relations at www.gopublic.com. According to the website, FBR provides, among other things, services for companies planning to go public. The website offers advice regarding alternative methods for privately held companies to become public and begin trading. One of the methods described on the website is merging with an existing shell company at a cost of $150,000 to $400,000. The website provides contact information for interested parties and seeks information from companies through an on-line questionnaire. Fearnow also owns and operates Focus Tech, which works in conjunction with FBR and performs the same services as FBR.

D. From at least September 1999 through July 2000, Fearnow and Focus Tech received a total of $232,000 in cash and at least 96,000 shares of stock for assisting in efforts to merge three public shell companies. Fearnow and Focus Tech located buyers and sellers of public shell companies using an Internet website and other sources. Contacts received through those means led to Fearnow and Focus Tech introducing parties to reverse mergers with public shells. Fearnow and Focus Tech also entered into consulting or "finders fee" agreements with numerous other public and private companies seeking to engage in reverse merger transactions. Further, Fearnow and Focus Tech in a number of instances transmitted documents between private companies and public shells seeking to merge, and evaluated public shell companies and potential buyers of public shell companies and transmitted that information to parties seeking to merge prior to making introductions. Moreover, in at least one instance Fearnow and Focus Tech relayed other information to parties seeking to merge and offered advice and suggestions regarding the terms of a reverse merger transaction.

E. Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act requires that any person or entity engaged in the interstate business of effecting securities transactions for the account of others must register with the Commission as a broker or dealer or, if a natural person, be associated with an entity that is registered with the Commission as a broker or dealer. By virtue of the conduct described above, the Respondents willfully violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act.1

III.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission deems it appropriate and in the public interest to accept the Offer submitted by Respondents and to impose the sanctions specified therein.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

A. Pursuant to Section 15(b)(4) of the Exchange Act, the Respondents be censured;

B. Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, the Respondents cease and desist from committing or causing any violation or future violation of Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act;

C. Pursuant to Section 21B and Section 15(b)(4) of the Exchange Act, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, Fearnow and Focus Tech Investments, Inc. shall together pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $10,000 to the United States Treasury. Such payment shall be: (1) made by United States postal money order, certified check, bank cashier's check or bank money order; (2) made payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission; (3) hand-delivered or mailed to the Office of the Comptroller, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 6432 General Green Way, Stop 0-3, Alexandria, VA 22312; and (4) submitted under cover letter which identifies Fearnow and Focus Tech Investments, Inc. as the Respondents in this proceeding, the file number of the proceeding, a copy of which cover letter and money order or check shall be sent to Donald M. Hoerl, Associate Regional Director, Securities and Exchange Commission, Central Regional Office, 1801 California Street, Suite 4800, Denver, Colorado 80202.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Footnote
1 In applying the term "willful" in Commission administrative proceedings instituted pursuant to Sections 15(b), 15B, 15C, 17A, and 19(h) of the Securities Exchange Act, Section 9 of the Investment Company Act, and Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act, the Commission evaluates on a case-by-case basis whether the respondent knew or reasonably should have known under the particular facts and circumstances that his conduct was improper. In this case, as in all Commission administrative proceedings charging a willful violation under these statutory provisions, the Commission applies this standard to persons -- specifically, securities industry professionals -- who are directly subject to Commission jurisdiction and who have a responsibility to understand their duties to the investing public and to comply with the applicable rules and regulations which govern their behavior.

sec.gov



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (88473)12/2/2004 11:55:53 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 122087
 
Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Instituted Against Lorsin, Inc., Loretta M. Lockhart, Craig K. Hjalmarson, Russell Management, Inc., George R. Siembida, Harold Engel, Jr., MicroCap Marketing, Inc., and Shane M. Nelson

Securities Act of 1933
Release No. 8308 / October 23, 2003
Administrative Proceeding
File No. 3-11310
Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Instituted Against Lorsin, Inc., Loretta M. Lockhart, Craig K. Hjalmarson, Russell Management, Inc., George R. Siembida, Harold Engel, Jr., MicroCap Marketing, Inc., and Shane M. Nelson
On October 23, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") instituted cease-and-desist proceedings against alleged Internet stock promoters Lorsin, Inc. ("Lorsin"), Loretta M. Lockhart ("Lockhart"), Craig K. Hjalmarson ("Hjalmarson"), Russell Management, Inc. ("Russell Management"), George R. Siembida ("Siembida"), Harold Engel, Jr. ("Engel"), MicroCap Marketing, Inc. ("MicroCap Marketing"), and Shane M. Nelson ("Nelson").

The Division of Enforcement ("Division") alleges that Energy & Engine Technology Corporation ("Energy & Engine"), a public company in Plano, Texas that maintains a natural gas gathering system, hired former stock promoter Siembida, of Depew, New York, and his company, Russell Management, to promote Energy & Engine on the Internet. Energy & Engine paid Siembida in stock that was improperly registered pursuant to a Form S-8 Registration Statement. (Form S-8 registration is not available for stock issued as compensation for stock promotion services.) Siembida subcontracted with Engel, who operates a small cap stock promotion website, WillyWizard.com, to promote Energy & Engine. To compensate Engel, Siembida transferred some of the shares he received from Energy & Engine to Engel.

The Division alleges that Engel, in turn, subcontracted with two other promoters, Hjalmarson and Nelson, to profile Energy & Engine on the Internet. Hjalmarson, of Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina, operates a website, GreedOrFear.com, through a corporation named Lorsin, which is headed by Lockhart, also of Kill Devil Hills. Nelson, of Bethany, Illinois, heads MicroCap Marketing, which promotes small cap companies on the Internet. Engel paid Hjalmarson and Nelson with a portion of the Energy & Engine shares he received from Siembida.

The Division further alleges that Engel and Nelson touted Energy & Engine on their websites, and that Hjalmarson distributed Energy & Engine press releases over the Internet. The promotion coincided with a 68 percent rise in the price of Energy & Engine's stock, from $0.29 to $0.49 per share, and average daily trading volume that was over 600% higher that the stock's historical daily volume. Siembida, Engel, Hjalmarson, and Nelson sold the stock that they had received for a combined total of over $14,000.

According to the Division's allegations, Siembida obtained the Energy & Engine shares in an unregistered offering with a view to distributing the stock to the public, making him an underwriter in a distribution of Energy & Engine stock. By participating in this distribution, Energy & Engine, Russell Management, Siembida, Engel, Lorsin, Hjalmarson, Lockhart, MicroCap Marketing, and Nelson violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.

The Division also alleges that Nelson and MicroCap Marketing participated in a second illegal stock distribution with another small cap issuer, ProActive Computer Services, Inc. ("ProActive"). ProActive, a Houston-based computer services provider, hired Nelson and MicroCap Marketing to promote ProActive in exchange for a combination of restricted and purportedly unrestricted ProActive shares. ProActive arranged for a third-party shareholder to transfer 300,000 ProActive shares to Nelson's brokerage account. Nelson posted ProActive profiles on his websites and touted ProActive in his electronic newsletter. Nelson sold the ProActive shares he received from the third-party shortly after receiving them for $1,340.50.

The Division alleges that Nelson obtained the ProActive shares with a view to distributing them to the public from a person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by ProActive, or under direct or indirect common control with ProActive. Therefore, the stock was restricted and could not be sold to the public for one year.

The Division further alleges that another issuer, whose stock was traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, hired Lorsin to promote it on the Internet. To pay for the promotion, the issuer directed two shareholders to transfer a total of 30,000 of its shares to Lorsin. Following the launch of Lorsin's promotional campaign, Lorsin sold a portion of the stock it had received from the issuer for $1,249.

According to the Division's allegations, Lorsin obtained the issuer's shares with a view to distributing them to the public from a person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by the issuer, or under direct or indirect common control with the issuer. Therefore, the stock was restricted and could not be sold to the public for one year.

The Division alleges that Lorsin, Lockhart, Hjalmarson, Russell Management, Siembida, Engel, MicroCap Marketing, and Nelson violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to determine whether the allegations in the Order are true and, if so, whether Lorsin, Lockhart, Hjalmarson, Russell Management, Siembida, Engel, MicroCap Marketing, and Nelson should be ordered to cease and desist from committing or causing violations of and any future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, and whether they should be ordered to disgorge the proceeds of their conduct.

The Commission directed that the administrative law judge shall issue an initial decision in this matter within 300 days from the date of service of the Order Instituting Proceedings.



sec.gov



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (88473)12/2/2004 12:32:02 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
Anyone know where the 300,000 sh of nsol came from? If from company how did they account for them in SEC filings?