Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (9120)	12/3/2004 2:51:04 AM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

On the shiny pieces of steel seen in this photo: digitaljournalist.org I was looking through some different sites last night and found one that described those pieces as being aluminum cladding from the exterior of the buildings. One clip I looked at showed those pieces sailing more than were falling, as if they were quite light. At this point I'm questioning my interpretation of the photos in that what I originally thought to be parts of the box columns, may actually be what amounts to aluminum siding. Here's the clip: st12.startlogic.com Since it's an item I included in the topic post, it's something I should fix if it's wrong. Comments, suggestions?.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (9120)	12/3/2004 5:54:46 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Ray > This would be consistent with the sort of steel components that went into the structure. I'm sure that's true. > I don't have a good scientific explanation for the pulverization that occurred on 9/11 in those three buildings WTC7 appeared to come down in the "standard" way ie its "box-like" structure appeared intact while it fell, indicating that most explosive charges must have been in the base of the building. WTC1 and 2 came down in a completely different way where the pictures show enormous explosions taking place in the structure itself. > This pulverization cannot be explained by mere gravitational forces That's why I say it's another "smoking gun". The only force I can think of which can cause it is that from an explosive -- and a big one, at that. > Sadly, we've already seen what happened when an Underwriter's Laboratory manager attempted to alert a NIST manager that there is something rotten in the state of Denmark We know that -- and that's why we spend our time bleating at chat groups like this one! As if we could do anything about it.