SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (153224)12/3/2004 11:11:47 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Most Iraqis want elections."

You cant always get what you want. Sometimes you have to work for it. I have yet to see enough of that. Think american revolutionary war--Could we have won our independence with france fighting england for our independence? Nope--americans had to step up. Enough did. In iraq in the contested areas in the triangle, few have. Shiaa mosque attacked. IT should be clear to them what terrorists and baathists have in mind for them. Time to fight. Where is al sadr now? mike
PS I know i am calling for a form of civil war here. So what. If the shiaa can start something, those supposed good sunnis out there can join in. And if they (the sunnis) choose the baathists and terrorists over democracy, they werent going to be such good allies anyway. Give them liberty or give them death. Stark choice for the triangle. mike



To: Neocon who wrote (153224)12/3/2004 1:01:13 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I find it interesting how opponents of the US initially wanted prompt withdrawal and an end to occupation and now they want to postpone elections. Opponents of the US need to understand one thing; Iraqi elections will be held on schedule.

* * *