Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (68336)	12/3/2004 3:02:36 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 89467

Wrong those priests were homos, doing each other. But they would do a young boy also. A 60 year old guy that does an 18 girl is a hetero, but if he does a 17 year old he's a pedophile? I don't think so.

To: Suma who wrote (68336)	12/3/2004 3:08:16 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 89467

"Hence the Priests who preyed on young men were pedophiles and not homosexuals." I don't know how you could have missed my point. Maybe I should have drawn a clear conclusion for you. A heterosexual adult male who likes young girls is not usually categorized as a pedophile unless its babies or pre-pubescent girls. An adult male who likes teenage boys is almost always categorized as a pedophile rather than a homosexual. That is the PC. You don't want to label men as homosexuals who pray on teenagers, you want to lable them 'pedophiles', yet you do not tend to do the same when it is a heterosexual situation. Least ways, I don't see it portrayed that way in the media. Hence the Priests who preyed on young men were pedophiles and not homosexuals. By your statement you proved my point. What is PC..You lost me. I honestly don't know how. You even used the term 'young men', which seems to validate my point. We don't think of young women as pedophile victims. We think of babies, toddlers and such but not young men and women ... except when it serves the PC/gay agenda.