SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oeconomicus who wrote (68352)12/3/2004 3:27:17 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
Stick to the factual articles and you'll be fine. Like for example:

- Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

oldamericancentury.org

There is a very nice list of factual articles for the actions of the Bush fascist regime.

- Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

Same here. There is a very nice list of factual articles for the actions of the Bush fascist regime.
oldamericancentury.org

- Religion and Government are Intertwined
Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

Same here. There is a very nice list of factual articles for the actions of the Bush fascist regime.
oldamericancentury.org



To: Oeconomicus who wrote (68352)12/3/2004 5:38:18 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 89467
 
There you go again being factual, accurate, logical &
reasonable.

And look where it got you.

:-\