Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (90638)	12/4/2004 1:07:19 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Paying taxes is (at least on NH) not dispositive of ownership....keep disputing his claim....

To: Ish who wrote (90638)	12/4/2004 1:32:58 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

You said you have an easement on the disputed section, right? If properly recorded, it should survive transfer of the property (Ask a lawyer. I'm not one - I just play one on TV;-). The subsequent owners should have been aware of it when they bought (it's part of the county land records) and are bound by it nonetheless. There are also circumstances, I understand, where your use of that little piece of the other lot for a very extended period of time with the knowledge and implied concent of your neighbor could lead to you having a continuing right to use it even without a recorded easement, but that's much trickier, especially with new owners objecting. But again, I'm not a lawyer. I don't even remember where I heard or read the second point. If it's important to you, ask a lawyer, or if you do have an actual, recorded easement, just show the new neighbor that.