Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Woodshed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yard_man who wrote (17680)	12/3/2004 11:00:23 PM
From: orkrious	Respond to of 60914

worth a read Message 20826393

To: yard_man who wrote (17680)	12/4/2004 7:10:21 PM
From: TH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 60914

foo, Been thinking about your post. There are no 9 year cycles (It;s every 13 and 17 years for cicadas right?). There are no 9.5 year, or 7.75 year, or 2.1245 year cycles either. Its like hyper-Calvinism, and man has no free will. With that said, the actions/results/turns described in these many cycles are real, and may in fact repeat in the form of a cycle. I just laugh when someone explains to me that X is going to happen on X date because they have back tested some formula and it has historically produced a result at some given interval. Watch out for those cicadas in 08. They will be back. GT TH