Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (18834)	12/4/2004 10:29:35 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

They seem to have a dizzying proliferation of Gold Mines. At a glance it "sounds good" but on closer inspection they have chewed off biggie projects that may defeat them. I cannot put my finger on where they are going with Bighorn or their other gold stuff. They need HG average, not just grabs to advance BH to mine status. The zonal thing I have seen before. Is it more gold or just dilution when costs are high? The magneto-titanium thing is moot too. Can the tito be separated from the magno? That is always the question. Heavy media is not a high volume product. Fancamp does not seem to be making much headway with real HG Titanium that works for Rio in the same grade and Tonnage. The Canajun market is not mature enough for real mines yet. Too much offshore offshore at any costs still in the brokery-yuse community. Worth following though. So many people popping biggie holes these days (ITF) that it's almost a drag. Solong may have an agenda. He has set up a lemonade stand on the side of his SI site. If he says the framers were denying ANY sort of religion as being dominant, they probably meant any sort of Christian really. Others need not apply. They were broad minded gents, mainly because they only ever foresaw one type of immigrant at the time. 'sides a constitution speaks to law, not religion per se. i.e. most religions already had a constitution. Even in the NT it refers to the laws of man as separate. In most law codes since Hammurabai, the focused on what the offenses and issues were, not the reason for their slant on them. The English law codes were what the framers most respected. The leaned heavily however on statutes, as they felt they had to say what was wrong or right. This is a non Saxon tradition that was carried over to Canada through different tradition. The DOI is actually a constitution. Meaning it is the doc that gives the reasons for constituting the gov't and its implicit raison to be and therefore structure. It is not tyrannical, ergo democratic. The constitution is a formal orgnizational doc. Canada had an implicit constitution, the BNA act and the Statute of Westminster. It also had other implicit institutions such as the Forest Charters and the Magna Charta. As well it inherited 1000 years of English Law. But the judges beset by the massive amount of Governor statute they had to obey as their office had been constituted obeying the King, ignored these people's rights that the English commoner enjoyed back home. That of the commons and the right of trial by case law. It had existed since Runnymede. This pretended ignorance of E Tradition long after it was necessary and Canada had responsible government was a liberal ruse (All CDN judges were Masons-Liberals and cynically manoeuvered to prove this point of lack of legal direction) in order to force a denying constitution that would grant them powers explicitly to challenge law. They always had it, in 1000 years of inheritance and absolute power over the bench. Canada was beset with effective pusillanimous morons who in their rigid denial of their tradition, refusing to effect a case law constitution of law, denied 1000 year of good history and a better system. We got Statute declared law, which is fundamentaly illogical and cannot define crime -0- It just confuses the issue. You cannot describe one bad fits all. Thus AS case law was and is superior. Osgoode hall was and is a fifth column liberal institution seeking dictatorship of legal statute and a tyrannical avuncular state of lords of power. King John would have been ecstatic. Canadian courts seek absolute power, not justice. Hence the David Milgards,Baltoviches, Truscotts, and countless other specious circumstantial cases that plague our courts and ruin lives unfairly. CDN courts are riddled with puffed up, conclustion jumping little minds, little logic and less common sense as presidents. The US is not far behind. With very little way of deciding guilt they just make it seem probable, and toss some unfortunate in Jail. Now with DNA, 100 death row inmates a year being found innocent, how many lesser cases are beset with the same sort of disease of bad judgement? EC<°-}