Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (14377)	12/4/2004 7:34:46 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

LOL! You claim to have looked at 2 out of thousands of articles. You then claim no bias exists, yet you provide no link to so your assertions can't be fact checked. Why am I not surprised? "The bias was in the question and the criteria you use to establish "liberal" (what is that exactly?)." I attempted to establish no such thing, nor did I have a biased question or biased criteria. You folks are so good at changing other people's words that you seem to forget there is an electronic record kept here. I just provided compelling evidence that Michael Watkins assertion was completely wrong. He said..... "I've read a few places that Google tends to return news with a conservative slant - that's rather interesting." This is what is actually said..... "Google News returned 803 results for "Fallujah" & "ruins". Based on the page one results alone, it accurately demonstrates a liberal bias in the results returned. it only gets more liberally biased from there." Any objective review of my Google search or any Google search on key words that have political implications will return a clearly disproportionate number of liberally biased articles almost every time. Try it if you don't believe me. But then you will have to really try to be objective, unlike your typical MSM journalist.