To: The Vet who wrote (22090 ) 12/5/2004 8:18:46 AM From: sea_urchin Respond to of 81142 Mr Vet > what that really means is that China is playing by exactly the same rules as the US keeping their rates at US levels. If China was actively devaluing their currency, then it could be considered to be unfair. But it is not; it is just playing by the US rules and maintaining its currency at the same level to the US dollar China has pegged its currency to the dollar but at a fraction of its value. Indeed, the renminbi must be the most undervalued currency in the world. And as the USD gets cheaper, so does the renminbi. And together with the cheap Chinese labour the effect is that no-one can compete with China when it comes to selling manufactured goods. As far as the US is concerned, its relationship with China is a double-edged sword. The US gains the cheap imports and that is anti-inflationary -- but at the expense of domestic non-production and unemployment and, of course, considerable debt. However, the Chinese then invest the profits they have made in US debt and this enables the game to continue a while longer. Truth is that the US is, I hate to say it -- like a prostitute, addicted to Chinese trinkets and dependent on Chinese money. The US feels they are buying the trinkets with paper, and maybe they are, but that paper is bleeding them to death. Indeed, to carry the analogy further, the prostitute has contracted a STD. So, even if the Chinese revalue the renminbi, I don't see how the US can easily come out of the bind? Yes, imports will be more expensive than they are but can the US match the Chinese prices even then? Devaluation doesn't automatically confer a market on the one who devalues. Enormous costs have to be incurred in plant and equipment before competitive production can be started and staff have to be trained. I contend that if the US has to do this after a renminbi revaluation it will be even worse for the Americans than it already is. > US can continue the game of cheating the overseas holders of their debt by devaluing the value of that debt without an act of overt default by the US. Sure, that's what they are doing but the problem is, like an addict, the US can't stop the game once they have compromised their creditors. For that to happen, the American people must stop spending and borrowing and their government must stop playing war -- but they can't. To settle the score and become solvent again, the US actually has to bring about a recession/depression and formally announce a default which they won't do. All the game playing is doing is merely postponing the evil day. So I imagine in time, maybe already, the world will learn to stop playing the US game and do business with only those who are able to honour their commitments. But who knows?