Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kikogrey who wrote (2682)	12/5/2004 12:20:05 AM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361658

Kiko I tried earlier to explain that John has had to wait for what may be good evidence regarding the votes. If he immediately whimpered on the 3rd he would have been accused of being a cry-baby. Maybe my comments will make sense in a few weeks and maybe they won't. How dare any of us for turning on the man who won the damn election? He never was, or is, God. Yes we need radicalism, but please wait a short while longer before we start stoning John for being what he has always been, a fighter, a hero, and yes... a friggin' politician. What if our perceived non-response is not a non-response? Would you then feel better? I would. Chuck

To: kikogrey who wrote (2682)	12/5/2004 12:48:54 AM
From: SiouxPal	Respond to of 361658

" I won't work my heart out again for the democrats unless they protest this fraud, even Gore did that." I am with you on that sentence. Remember Gore? He protested without the evidence needed to overturn the election. Our problem now to me is that the e-machines without paper trails will not help John win. He needs more than that IMO. He needs whistleblowers and his time to present them has not expired. It is a chess game of outragious proportions but it must be worked well with more backup than recounting a scam-ridden Diebold or equal machine. Tell me what you think John should have done. Sioux