SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (68569)12/6/2004 2:23:39 PM
From: Suma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
OR IT YOU CANNOT SEE IT WITHOUT A MAGNIFYING GLASS .....Now here's another thing.....

MILITARY -- SOLDIERS SUE OVER STOP-LOSS: The New York Times reports eight U.S.
soldiers currently serving in Iraq and Kuwait will file a lawsuit today in
federal court in Washington " challenging the Army policy known as stop-loss
(http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/06/national/06soldiers.html?ex=1259989200&en=658c61635ae9b99b&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland)
." Marketed as a policy to "promote continuity within deployed units," the Army
last spring mandated that "if a soldier's unit is still in Iraq or Afghanistan,
that soldier cannot leave even when his or her enlistment time runs out. Since
then, a handful of National Guardsmen who received orders to report for duty in
California and Oregon have taken the policy to court, but the newest lawsuit is
the first such challenge by a group of soldiers." The policy being challenged by
the eight soldiers "has barred thousands of soldiers from leaving Iraq this year
even though the terms of enlistmentd they signed up for have run out."

I cannot buy that those soldiers should have read the small print...