Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (9152)	12/6/2004 4:10:14 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

Thanks, Don. I have seen that picture before but, as I said, I was under the impression that the whole central column matrix was embedded in concrete. I have to say those are excellent pictures, in fact, awe-inspiring -- until one considers the enormity of the crime that had been committed in order to make them. Actually, I don't think in my whole life I have deliberately looked at pictures of anything as much as I have studied those of the WTC on 9-11. Coming back to the columns, or rather what was left of them, this satellite picture of the site shows exactly how they were smashed up into into a myriad of small pieces with none of the thirty-eight, four-inch steel central columns remaining standing. The whole building was obliterated. home.comcast.net > why the core failed the way it did, or why not a single stick of it was left standing after the dust settled Indeed. I wonder if you have any idea of the kind of explosives, or whatever, that could have been used to turn thirty-eight, thousand plus feet long, four-inch thick, steel frames into, effectively, "mashed-potato"? One thing is certain, gravity alone could not do that.