SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (89455)12/6/2004 6:12:47 PM
From: Whitebeard  Respond to of 793917
 
I'm with you.

It's not just fundamental Christians who find the attacks on the holiday offensive, it's secular, part time Christians also.

The overall affect of living in the bluest area of a blue state is that Christmas and Christians are stigmatized.

It isn't about the holidays specifically either; it's about the underpinning morality and set of values.

They are being attacked and with it the common culture.

It's all part of multi-culturism and it is horribly destructive to the country.



To: DMaA who wrote (89455)12/6/2004 6:25:28 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793917
 
I don't find secular crismus offensive, I find it insane.

Seems to me that the simple solution is to separate Christmas from all the secular stuff. We could do the tree and the presents and the secular parties on the solstice or on New Years and let Christmas be a religious holiday. That should suit both the Non-Christians and the purist Christians. Of course the majority of people in the middle, who comfortably merge mangers and Xmas trees, might be inconvenienced because they'd have to arrange two family gatherings or choose between the two.

And it might contribute to national obesity if families consume two turkeys... <g>