Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (18884)	12/6/2004 8:43:30 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"God would not be testable or perceivable being super natural. Ergo, existent but not necessarily real." NO. NOT necessarily esistent...and "not necessarily real" "WOULD BE...WOULD NOT BE"...imagine anything you like! Children do!! "Remember we are talking about a conceptual thing, that is beyond the universe system, as it cannot exist as part of it. It operates by its own laws." No--I can invent an INFINITE number of such " conceptual things". There is no way to talk about such stuff. It has no logical foundation. YOU can yammer about stuff "beyond the universe system"! Some idiot will take you on! You can yap about those wonderful days before "the universe did not exist yet and had no laws" Teach us, if you will! YOU know about the universe before it existed and had no natural laws?? I guess that is plausible. YOU are always welcome to help...