Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Fascist Oligarchs Attack Cute Cuddly Canadians -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommy Moore who wrote (1152)	12/7/2004 1:22:50 AM
From: Snowshoe	Respond to of 1293

Canada carves another notch in lumber trade tiff with new NAFTA ruling Wed Dec 1, 5:15 PM ET STEVE MERTL VANCOUVER (CP) - Canada is claiming another win in its softwood lumber war with the United States. A North American Free Trade Agreement panel on Wednesday rejected for the third time the U.S. Commerce Department (news - web sites)'s final determination on the countervailing duty slapped on Canadian lumber imports. Canadian exporters have been paying an average 18.8 per cent countervailing duty for shipments into the American market since May 2002, plus an anti-dumping levy averaging more than eight per cent. The NAFTA panel remanded the countervailing duty determination back to Commerce, rejecting the way it calculated the alleged subsidy accorded Canadian lumber through low Crown timber-cutting fees levied by the provinces and other favourable policies. The panel, whose rulings carry the weight of law under the NAFTA treaty, gave Commerce until Jan. 24 to deal with a dozen specific concerns. The anti-dumping component of the tariff has previously come under fire in separate NAFTA rulings and Canada has successfully challenged both duties before the World Trade Organization (news - web sites). This is the third time the NAFTA panel rejected Commerce's duty calculations, said Jacquie LaRocque, spokeswoman for federal Trade Minister Jim Peterson. "In fact the panel has said the duties themselves go against U.S. law," she said in a statement from Ottawa. "Canada maintains its softwood lumber is traded fairly and we won't stop until the duties are dropped." The B.C. Lumber Trade Council noted the panel - a majority of them American - unanimously found Commerce acted arbitrarily in determining Canadian lumber producers were subsidized. The decision has enormous implications for all major Canadian lumber-producing provinces, said council president John Allan. "If the Commerce Department followed those instructions of the panel . . . if it (the duty rate) goes below one per cent on a national basis, then it's automatically zeroed out and the subsidy case would disappear," Allan said in an interview. "That would be a huge victory for us." Canadian lumber exporters have paid almost $4 billion in duties since May 2002 and are depositing it at a rate of $150 million a month. The money is held in U.S. Customs trust accounts while the duties are appealed before NAFTA and WTO bodies. Canada won a key victory earlier this fall when a separate NAFTA panel ruled Canadian lumber imports posed no threat of injury to American producers, who filed the 2001 trade complaint that resulted in the duties. The panel essentially ordered the U.S. International Trade Commission to find no threat of injury after it too rejected the commission's argument and calculations three times. The U.S. government confirmed last week it would appeal that decision to a NAFTA extraordinary challenge committee, which is expect to rule by March. If Canada wins there, the reason for imposing the duties would be removed. However, U.S. officials have signalled they won't return the money already deposited. Under a piece of U.S. legislation known as the Byrd Amendment, companies that claim injury from subsidized imports can apply to receive some of the money. However, the WTO has ruled the Byrd Amendment violates international trade rules and authorized Canada, among other countries, to retaliate. Canadian lumber exporters are paying countervailing and anti-dumping duty deposits at a combined average of 27.2 per cent, the rate set in 2002. Various reviews have provisionally revised the rate downward, but the duty-deposit rate itself won't change until Commerce publishes its administrative review in about two weeks.

To: Tommy Moore who wrote (1152)	12/7/2004 1:39:27 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 1293

money.cnn.com

To: Tommy Moore who wrote (1152)	12/11/2004 1:36:59 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1293

Yeah it was getting a bit off-topic there wasn't it .... just another reflection of the fact that very few care about this issue, which is of course its central cause - not even homebuilders and buyers in the US who are getting ripped off by the yellow pine lobby give a damn .... each one loses only a few hundreds or thousands, so even if they're aware of it, they don't care enough to stand up against the vermin that are diddling the market Don't care that much myself most days now ... it is what it is, a sad comment on our species, we just have to deal with it, muddle on through, and learn the lesson integral - we must always always stand on guard for Thee with vigour, never lose one inch of our sovereignty to those filthy buggers