Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (89661)	12/8/2004 2:03:03 AM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793896

Basically, what you are saying is that it makes a difference if the person making the speech is representing the Government and giving a speech on behalf of the Government on Government property? I guess you could say that the streets of Denver are Government property. Using that logic, all religious speech should be banned. In the case under discussion, one could ask why that restriction does not include those who celebrate homosexuality and a Chinese holiday tradition? And why only Christians are restricted? I thought the use of the "public square" was shared by all. The focus is NOT on the content of the speech, it's on the actor, the person or organization delivering the speech.