To: Man on the moon who wrote (88654 ) 12/8/2004 4:47:53 AM From: hedgefundman Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087 Moonman, I love your posts. The man who is guilty in his own mind is always the most moronic, desperate and boisterous in his deee nials. "T'aint me," brayed the donkey, hoping to remove himself from the sheeple pack. (I love to repeat that as it so moves you to braying.) If you were truly innocent, as you idiotically proclaim, you'd detail the why's and the wherefore's. Or you would ignore my posts and those of others as being those of vengeful lunatics. Luna, being in your ascendency, desperation being your mother, it's clear that you are getting more frantic as evidence comes out about the use of the private site by associates and sheeple for "tainted" information. Unlike you, I wish no person ill, just for the truth to come out. I am on the sidelines here, as are many in silence, hoping that another scam is totally disclosed for intelligence and knowledge is the enemy of the scamster. If proven, either in the current trial or in subsequent civil trials, this scam will be shown as a most cynical one as it was disguised as one that would itself combat other scams. The Robbing Hood band of merry faith men can do no wrong, so long as they could use the scam to line their pockets and then puff their chests out as you so vainly try to do now. The bold , the CAPS, the ===========> arrow posts that served so well are now coming back to bite the rear ends of the scamsters. I am waiting and watching and wish you no ill. Let yourself be at peace if you are truly innocent. I suspect you will be back sniping and yapping, as others here are, protesting your innocence, denying the shell game. "I wasn't a member of the site," doesn't preclude being a member of a conspiracy. Pretending not to see information "too many chat rooms," does not make one innocent. In civil actions, the burden of proof is preponderance of the evidence. The simplest answer is often the one that is believed. Keep that in mind.