Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (90943)	12/9/2004 9:43:24 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

This is nice: I didn't SAY I didn't think the WaPo didn't report Clarke accurately. Yikes. A claim to have been misread coming after a sentence like that..... Yes, it is true in your previous post you did not SAY the WP was inaccurate (guessing here that that's what you meant above) - you merely said they might have been: The WaPo often makes mistakes, and the people the WaPo quotes are not immune from mistakes. I don't ASSUME- I verify. Sure, you apply to this standard to every anti-Bush piece you see. Uh-huh. I've never considered not knowing a very good form of proof of anything, except ignorance. Good. So not knowing that Saddam and AQ collaborated isn't proof of anything, in particular, proof that they didn't.