Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (89987)	12/9/2004 9:44:58 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793891

Was the author of that opinion Justice Sanders, by any chance? I posted that to raise some temperatures. :>) It was an AP story. Try the Seattle papers for the Judge.

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (89987)	12/9/2004 9:44:59 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793891

Sounds like it had to do with the privacy rights of the criminal defendant who was the other party on the line.

To: Alan Smithee who wrote (89987)	12/9/2004 10:43:48 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793891

I thought most states had a law against wiretapping conversations to which you are not a party, even in your own home. In VA, a lawyer that tells a client to wiretap conversations to which he/she is not a party will be disbarred.