Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Dave who wrote (433)	12/10/2004 12:25:33 AM
From: ravenseye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

I highly doubt the motives were as pure as driven snow for what I saw on the screen when I attempted to submit my previous post to you. 6 posts of the identical post were generated, amazing thing about those rules huh, considering I'm limited to 3 posts a day. I'm the one who edited 5 of the 6 to be blank. And now I see SI removed the remaining one post while they allow others that harass people, of which leads me to believe they don't like being reminded they created exceptions to the rule for tony when they had a vote a few years back instead of adhering to their own rules. I don't find SI to be very friendly especially after seeing script about remote access and for what ever reason, my post was removed probably because I don't like the condescending tone used on me about the rules that are viewed with a blind eye when it comes to the harassing posts Ive read targeting others. Getting back to your comments about the ban you lifted awhile back on the A@P thread, maybe you will recall (or scroll the archive to see it's true) I was the one who asked why there was censorship before you lifted that ban.