SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (90963)12/10/2004 9:32:50 AM
From: J. C. Dithers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I thought you had something like that in mind, Neo. If evolution is in fact producing change in a linear upward direction to ever more complex and perfected life forms, it becomes difficult to view it as random and chaotic.

The theory of evolution is itself under some clouds. Darwin said he hoped that eventually transitional fossils would be found. To my knowledge, there is not a museum in the world that has one single specimen of a fossil in a stage of transition from one species to another.



To: Neocon who wrote (90963)12/10/2004 10:35:12 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
You don't understand evolution at all. It's not random in any sense of the word (although you might have been taught in school that it was the non-random selection of random gene changes- but even that isn't the thinking in the scientific community anymore- it's a much more active process...)



To: Neocon who wrote (90963)12/10/2004 3:05:12 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
But how does your dubious gloss of what evolution allegedly is demonstrate that "Any consistent atheism will acknowledge that . . . evolution is a dead end"? Just because you, personally, can't find any meaning it it means that "any consistent atheism" can't either? Or what?