Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : NFL - Real NFL Talk ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JustTradeEm who wrote (1073)	12/10/2004 9:44:55 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1082

So, using the logic in your post, wouldn't this mean, of the division leaders, the Eagles have had the toughest schedule? Its possible that they have had the toughest schedule but 1 - The most games against teams with a winning record isn't the same as the toughest schedule. If team A plays two games against teams that are one game over 500 and one game against a winless team, while Team B plays two games against teams that have won most of their games and one game against a team that is .500 than Team B had the tougher record. 2 - Also there just aren't as many good teams in the NFC this year. The Eagles would still have a good record in the AFC IMO, and I think they would make the playoffs but they would not stand out the way they do in the NFC. Tim