SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (477)12/11/2004 12:29:49 PM
From: ravenseye  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5425
 
You posted P.S. The powers that be have now given you the opportunity to post five times a day and not three. You're welcome.
Does that mean you are one of the powers?



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (477)12/11/2004 6:12:22 PM
From: Louie_al-Arouri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5425
 
The only reason any knucklehead would have to believe Cleveland that it was $6M (and not $300K), is if they accept the convoluted garbage you post here. There was a $300k POST-911 settlement on Tony's kid's trust account. NOWHERE is it said Tony attempted to liquidate $6 million from his kids' trust pre-9/11. The pre-9/11 transaction was a DONATION to bin laden's Blessed Relief.
First we had Truthseeker making a fool of himself trying to con the public that the donation went to a different Blessed Relief. Thats why thy the Cantor Fitzgerald civil suit is so important, the court docs show us that Tony donated to bin Laden's Blessed Relief. Was it $6 million Tony donated in the seperate transaction/donation to Blessed Relief? Maybe it was $5.7 million? Who cares? What you're doing now, after parrotting Truthseeker's claims that there were 2 different Blessed Relief orgs (and that Tony donated to the red, white & blue one) is changing your story to there was only one transaction. Wrong. It reads easy. Your revision of it is what is hard to swallow.