SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (18398)12/12/2004 9:59:39 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Rojas and Maldanado live in a two-room apartment in Hawthorne but have china settings for 16 tucked in a wooden hutch. The family struggles to meet its monthly bills but has taken on a mountain of credit-card debt. They have used plastic to buy a large-screen TV and other luxuries but have also relied on it to cover bare necessities such as rent and emergency-room visits.

"We've won the War on Poverty," asserted Robert Rector, an influential analyst with the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington think tank. "We've basically eliminated widespread material deprivation."

But if deprivation is no longer as big a problem, that hardly means all is well. In many ways, Rojas is the new face of the working poor, suffering not so much from a dearth of possessions as from a cavalcade of chaos — pay cuts and eviction notices, car troubles and medical crises — that rattles her family's finances and nudges it toward the economic brink.

latimes.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (18398)12/12/2004 10:45:16 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Rasmussen Consumer Index Down One to 113.1

Investor Index Loses One to 135.7
Updated Daily by 8:00 AM Eastern

Rasmussen Consumer Index
Today 113.1
Yesterday 113.8
Week Ago 114.0
Month Ago 117.4

RasmussenReports.com

Rasmussen Investor Index
Today 135.7
Yesterday 137.1
Week Ago 137.6
Month Ago 141.4

RasmussenReports.com



Sunday December 12, 2004-- The Rasmussen Consumer Index lost nearly a point on Sunday to 113.1. The Index, which measures the economic confidence of American consumers on a daily basis, is down one from a week ago, down four from a month ago and down one from three months ago.

The Rasmussen Investor Index lost more than a point on Sunday to 135.7. It is down two points from a week ago and down six from a month ago. The Investor Index is up one from three months ago.

A year ago today, the Consumer Index was at 112.4. Two years ago, it was at 95.3.

The Investor Index was at 135.0 last year on December 12 and at 105.8 two years ago.

Historical data and supplemental information on the Rasmussen Index is available to RR Premium Members. The Rasmussen Index is updated each morning at 8:00 a.m. Eastern.

Data available to Premium Members includes daily updates of individual questions such as how Consumers and Investors rate the economy, how they rate their own personal finances, whether the economy is getting better or worse, whether their own finances are getting better or worse, and whether they believe the U.S. economy is in a recession. To learn more, click HERE. To sign up, click HERE.

The Rasmussen Index was established in October 2001 and is updated daily. It has consistently shown Economic Confidence trends in advance of the traditional indicators provided by the Conference Board and University of Michigan.

The Rasmussen Consumer Index reached its highest level ever at 127.0 on January 6, 2004. The low for 2004 was reached May 27 at 104.6. Prior to this year, the highest level ever reached was 124.3 on April 2, 2002. The highest point reached in 2003 was 123.2 (December 30 and 31). The lowest level ever measured by the Consumer Index was reached March 11, 2003 at 83.2.

The Rasmussen Investor Index reached its highest level ever at 150.9 on January 7, 2004. Prior to the capture of Saddam Hussein in December 2003, the highest level ever reached by the Investor Index was 142.8 on March 28, 2002. The lowest level ever measured was 91.1 on March 13, 2003.

The baseline for the Rasmussen Consumer Index was established at 100.0 in October 2001. The current level of 113.1 means that overall levels of economic confidence are higher than in the aftermath of the 9-11 terrorist attacks.

The current Index data is from a national telephone survey of 1,500 adults conducted by Rasmussen Reports over the past three nights. The margin of sampling error for each individual question in the survey is +/- 2.6 percentage points, with a 95% level of confidence. This survey is part of a larger series of data used to compile the Rasmussen Index on a daily basis.

rasmussenreports.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (18398)12/12/2004 11:32:37 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
The bankruptcy machine

Assembly line fed by easy credit, eager lawyers and life's misfortunes

Message 20849728



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (18398)12/12/2004 11:37:51 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
A New Way to Hedge Your Home's Paper Profit
By CONRAD DE AENLLE

(from the NY Times)

IF you have owned a home for several years, you may be sitting on a sizable increase in equity. And if you are worried that the run-up in housing prices can't last much longer, you may think the only choice is to call a broker, rent a moving van and head for the (less expensive) hills.

But through an increasing number of new investments, you may be able to limit future erosion of your home's value.

Macro Securities Research, a company affiliated with Robert J. Shiller, the Yale economist, has reached an agreement with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange to list pairs of derivative instruments that are essentially index funds linked to home prices in certain markets. One instrument in each pair will rise as its market index rises; the other will rise as the same index falls. That will let investors bet on the direction of housing prices. Similar, but less sensitive, vehicles are being offered by HedgeStreet, a firm in San Mateo, Calif., that offers small-scale derivatives speculation online.

For homeowners looking for alternatives to the risks and complications of derivatives trading, there are also insurance policies that pay out if home prices fall, but they are only available in certain areas, and the conditions for collecting are highly restrictive.

In fact, none of these approaches are likely to provide anything close to a perfect hedge, eliminating all risk of loss. And while the options available to nervous homeowners are growing in number and sophistication, some advisers warn that they may provide minimal protection from the vicissitudes of the real estate market.

But other, simpler strategies may help you prepare for a softening of the market, they add. One is to avoid variable-rate mortgages before any serious increase in interest rates - an event regarded as a possible trigger for a reversal in home prices.

Macro Securities hopes to list its instruments in Chicago before such a reversal, but the exchange's announcement this month was short on details, like a starting date. Mr. Shiller, the company's chief economist, said that his securities would track home price indexes in cities yet to be chosen, although strong candidates include New York, Los Angeles and Las Vegas, he said.

The minimum investment for the securities and the amount of leverage built into them are also not yet known. A one-percentage-point move in the index, he said, may produce a change of two percent or three percent in the value of the securities.

An important feature of the Macro securities, he said, is that they will come in twos - one moving in tandem with the index and the other in the opposite direction. Having a single index fund would require a hedger to sell short, raising the theoretical prospect of an infinite loss. (That could happen only if housing prices rose to infinity - not a far-fetched idea to many people who are looking to buy a co-op in Manhattan.)

Another set of derivative products linked to home prices was introduced in October by HedgeStreet, which specializes in online trading of pint-sized contracts it calls "hedgelets." Each is a yes-or-no wager that a housing index will be in a certain range on a given date within three months. After that period, the contracts expire, and losing bets are worthless.

There are three residential property bets, representing percentage moves in an index whose level may be higher, lower or even with the recent trend in home price movements, for each of six cities: New York, Miami, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego.

But the value of each contract is a paltry $10, and they are infrequently traded, at best, so unless you live in a matchbox, it would be difficult - and very expensive - to buy enough of them to provide a practical hedge.

Russell Andersson, a vice president of HedgeStreet, said that the products were new and were still seeking an audience. He conceded that their three-month life span was too fleeting for use by many homeowners and said that HedgeStreet was planning to introduce vehicles that would trade much like futures contracts and last for one and three years.

"With a combination of these two products, you can hedge out very aggressive short-term movements as well as longer-term movements," Mr. Andersson said.

Mr. Shiller says his approach to defending against price declines is meant to be useful even for people with modest incomes. "We're looking for a vehicle with widespread acceptance," he said. The device of two separate funds is one way to gain it, in his opinion. "It means there is no loss beyond the initial outlay, no margin calls," he said.

That may not be true if leverage is built into the instruments, as Mr. Shiller envisions. But homeowners looking for further protection may consider borrowing against their equity, knowing that it will rise enough to make up any decrease in the fund's value, he said. Should home prices fall, the value of the fund that is inversely correlated to the housing market will rise, mitigating the loss.

"Volatile markets are increasingly becoming a part of our lives," Mr. Shiller added. "The home market itself is becoming more volatile. We're in the biggest real estate bubble in history, I believe.

"We haven't seen a swing down yet, but it could be coming," he warned. "There are people with big houses and big mortgages who are going to feel the pinch."

Jonathan Golub, a strategist at J. P. Morgan Fleming Asset Management in New York, agreed. The culprit in a downturn, he believes, will be big mortgages, more than big houses. Variable-rate mortgages, in particular, could be a problem.

When interest rates are low, buyers can afford more house for the same monthly payment, said Mr. Golub, who himself is a renter in Manhattan. He said that any holder of a variable-rate mortgage must understand that "if interest rates drop, the house is worth more to me, and vice versa; if rates rise, I'm toast."

Burned on both sides, too, because the higher mortgage payments tend to depress home prices. "You get hit with a double whammy," he said. "The cost of carrying goes up and the value goes down."

NATIONWIDE, he noted, home prices rose 7 percent a year, on average, from 1999 to 2003, roughly double the rate for rental prices. Over the previous 15 years, the two rose more or less in tandem, with one outpacing the other for a while before the pattern reversed.

Mr. Golub says he expects home prices to hold up until mortgage rates rise further, so there is time for homeowners to prepare. His advice is to "lock down that fixed-rate mortgage."

As for the hedging vehicles being offered, he has doubts about their utility for most current and prospective homeowners. "The adviser who would sell them won't be able to understand them," he said. "They're the kind of thing you see pushed at the top of a market."

For someone considering buying a home now, "the smart thing to do is rent," he said.

"It probably does not make sense for someone who owns a home and plans to stay there to sell it and rent it back," he added. "But what probably makes sense is for that first-time homebuyer or guy planning to retire to Florida to rent instead of buy."



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (18398)12/12/2004 11:47:41 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
George on Patron's real estate board writes....

My State Planning Office Forecast has been reliable for years and I expect many of your states have able, straightforward economists too.

Take a look at the 2005 housing/refinance figures near the bottom of this 1 page pdf. The slowdown, especially on top of this year's drop in refi activity, is pretty severe.

Geo.

state.me.us
==================================================
Anyone have these forecasts for other states?

here is the original post displayed in entirety above
Message 20850142



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (18398)12/12/2004 12:12:14 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
commentary on oil cutbacks
theleftcoaster.com