Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (9256)	12/13/2004 9:31:39 AM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

RE: "I'm not sure what error you are referring to. Please advise" It was the reference to 5,000 killed in the attacks vs. the actual figure of 3,000. I don't like to see those kind of typos in articles quoting facts and figures without references. I'm not sure when the piece was written, the date suggests it was recently, but some of the references, such as that one, might indicate it was shortly after the attacks when confirmed numbers were not available. This article on WTC 6 is also interesting: americanfreepress.net Here are a few items I ran across on detonators: isee.org; focusonaggregates.com hstc.com I still didn't find what I was looking for on detonators, but as close as I can tell, the creativity involved in making devices for blowing things up goes beyond even a science fiction writers wildest imagination. Radios, microwaves, lasers, satellites, you name it; if you want to blow something up, it can be done anywhere from next door to outer space. Take your pick, setting it off was the easy part.