SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (90446)12/13/2004 10:52:35 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793853
 
Well, what I meant was, its possible, I dont really know and I am not trying to sell a bill of goods here, that his wife hired the Nanny in his absence and paid her in his absence, and when he finally came back home (wasnt he gone something like a year?) , there was then no more need for the Nanny and she was let go? jdn



To: Lane3 who wrote (90446)12/13/2004 11:07:59 AM
From: aladin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793853
 
Karen,

He could reasonably have not known she was illegal.

I have had to hire help recently and when interviewing prospective domestic help its not rocket science to request a Social Security card and proof of eligibility to work. In fact its good, sound legal advise....

Now if she had such documentation and it was fraudulent, thats a different story. Individuals do not have the resources to do background checks for this kind of employee.

John


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News