Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (91248)	12/13/2004 1:00:58 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

<appease these animals as you suggest or whether we take the fight to all those who encourage, finance, train, or given haven to those who target innocents to further a radical agenda.....> That's a pretty broad brush with which to paint a country, their people, and the carnage of American soldiers and innocent Iraqis, all paying the price for the actions of a handful of Saudi's (and NOT Iraqis) led by a guy related to friends of the Bush family (who have been to family picnics on the "ranch") . Not to mention the U.S. trained these "animals". Who is responsible for the gore and mayhem in the Coliseum, the lion, the guy who trains the lion, or the emperor and his men? What kind of pressure is Bush putting on the bin Laden family leadership, his wealthy friends? Didn't GWB say about the actual perp of 9/11 that he wasn't that concerned about him?

To: jlallen who wrote (91248)	12/13/2004 1:11:21 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

? You have got to be kidding. Where did I ever Ever EVER suggest appeasement. You can't find it. You won't find it, because I didn't say it. It's a poor debater who has to fabricate an opponent. You will probably have more fun with your imaginary correspondent than you do with me, though, because your imaginary correspondent is no challenge. That is why people make up straw men- because they can't handle real arguments. I think you really believe what you wrote about what I said. Amazing, truly- that you could be so out of touch with words that were (imo) pretty plainly spoken. You have my compassion. I wonder if it would be kinder to ignore you, and give you no challenge to your artificial reality, or to continue to challenge it? I honestly don't know what is best for you.