Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (213347)	12/14/2004 9:40:04 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577177

Maybe as a member of the biased left she chooses what she hears? If I were to read and watch right wing sources I might have a warped view of the world. She appears to read / watch only left wing sources. Only consuming conservative sources would be very difficult to achieve and impractical due to the fact that 95% of all media outlets are biased Democrat / left. It is easy for people like Amy to ignore and / or dismiss those views that do not conform to her biased opinions. It is difficult for a centrist or a conservative to ignore leftist opinions because of the sheer volume of them.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (213347)	12/14/2004 11:33:03 AM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577177

Because there were media reports about both and 3,000 people decided "God material" was more important. Regards, Amy J PS re: "Maybe it's because one of those incidents is higher on the profile list." And why would that be? Why would Fox make "God material" a higher priority than the smashing of the head of a mentally retarded at teh same school? You certainly don't think Fox was "presuming" their religious audience would get more upset by the supression of "God material" than by the head smashing of a mentally retarded. PSS Interesting how your post didn't even contain a single phrase acknowledging how horrible the incident is. Is this typical of so-called evanglistic religious people?