Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (9276)	12/14/2004 8:00:09 AM
From: sea_urchin	Respond to of 20039

Gus > As you know, I think the explosions at WTC-7, WTC-6, the State Dept., etc. were devised as "coverups" for the hijacked airliners... Hence the possibility/risk that the number of explosions don't add up with the number of hijacked planes (that were shot down by the USAF). Remember my theory of "meshing it all together", that is, connecting the dots of X hijacked planes with Y "suicide crashes" (on symbolic targets) And you compare yourself with Galileo. At least you didn't say Occam! > As for the mundane theory that "greedy Mr Silverstein & Co" contrived such a murderous scam to swindle their insurers, here's an interesting article that points to the fact that insurance policies usually DO NOT cover criminal acts Don't worry, Larry baby got paid for two separate terrorist attacks. In view of all the explosions, I'm surprised he didn't get paid for at least five terrorist attacks. Maybe he fell asleep in the courtroom and forgot to mention them all? How remiss can one get?! > Now don't get me wrong: I'm not looking to clear Mr Silverstein of any involvement in the 911 conspiracy but it would have been a long shot for him to destroy his WTC estate just to cash in on their insurances. Not "just to cash in on their insurances" -- but a few billion here and there definitely helps towards a rainy day.