Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Gold and Silver Stocks and Related Commentary -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (550)	12/14/2004 3:13:05 PM
From: ralfph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18308

Yes. We are in this to make money. I want the folks who pay for the service to have a chance to quietly load up in the weeks following an anouncement. otherwise we are fighting with each other to get some stock and the price becomes artificialy high. The stock will not stay there. We get screwed. Once a core of us are holding AND there is a reason to start talking -then lets do so. But I want more than just Claudes picks. We must look elsewhere or we will do ourselves in. Claude is not the eyes ,ears,and brain for therest of us. Indeed what we should be doing is looking hard and deep and acting as his eyes and ears. We can then expect Claude to act as a mentor and say (a) Put that down it is dirty and you do not know who has been playing with it ! ) (b) What a nice pick, you get a gold star (c)Run away ,run away (d) Thats nice dear ,I will look at it later (e) hell if I know. What ever the case , I think this team effort of ours needs to be doing a bit more homework and a little less chatting over tea . This is not a criticizm.... I want more ideas, comments on stock,stock action,land and who to stay away from. ralfph Imagine how we would feel if as a group we had noticed the uranium run, and coal this year. Say we had put 20 % into uranium stocks last Jan. Yeah I know I had LAM but that had little to do with being smart.

To: loantech who wrote (550)	12/14/2004 3:37:57 PM
From: ogi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18308

I reiterate that we all have a common purpose as Claude's subscribers and that should preclude our blabbing out of turn. If it is a new pick for Claude but not for some on the thread then it should not be mentioned in connection with Claude. That should be simple and for a guideline the same two week blackout should work. As a subscriber, I do not want to diminish the value of CC's newsletter by devaluing its use to my fellow subscribers. Which is why I am not screaming HE PICKED MY STOCK, HE PICKED MY STOCK!!!! Doing so might be beneficial short term but ultimately it would hurt me and Claude's fellow readers. Cheers, Ogi