SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rock_nj who wrote (9295)12/14/2004 8:53:23 PM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
[1] Paine Stewart's plane was intercepted in twenty minutes according to published reports I've read. I've also read that [2] it is routine for the FAA to contact NORAD upon losing contact with an airplane and that military jets are routinely scrambled. [3] There is a published figure for the months preceeding 9/11/01, in which the military scrambled jets over 100 times in 2001 to intercept commercial aircraft.

Three assertions of fact, with no documentation - although I'm anecdotally sure that the second assertion is correct. As for the first and third, well...

Survey says? "XXX"!

[W]e couldn't even defend our military nerve center with over an hour lead time, something really doesn't add up in that scenario. If not, why not? Why are our defenses so poorly designed?

Who designed them?

Not sure why someone would go to the trouble [of planting explosives within the World Trade Center] since they could have been detected and just the impact of the planes hitting the WTC was enough to acheive any sort of goal to put fear in the general public over terrorism.

Agreed - absolutely.

If there were some gigantic conspiracy afoot, why wouldn't

*they*

...have simply copied the Islamic fundamentalists' attempt to destroy the World Trade Center in 1993 - but this time with larger explosives, more accurate positioning of the vehicle(s), etc.?

[I]f seimsmographs [sic] actually detected some sort of disturbance before the buildings collapsed, and why the buildings would fall at the rate that gravity tells us they should and not be slowed by friction with the standing parts of the building.

For the second time: I've seen nothing of those allegations. Have you got a link or some other - and I implore you, Rock, for the love of great Ulysses, credible - source itemizing those alleged anomalies?

e