Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Dave who wrote (694)	12/14/2004 4:06:54 PM
From: Dale Baker	Respond to of 5425

If TOU violations are a complex, subjective interpretation on a par with dissecting the great religious texts in human history, perhaps the TOU should not include admonishments that "abusive" posts are a violation that will not be tolerated. Otherwise people who find attacks and insults abusive will be confused when numerous attacking, insulting posts are not removed and their authors disciplined accordingly. If they are routinely tolerated, whither the TOU? Sounds like the difference between black-letter law and judicial discretion. Seriously, you should rewrite the TOU if it's all that gray, IMHO.

To: SI Dave who wrote (694)	12/14/2004 4:25:25 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

Here's someone caught lieing. Credibility shot to hell PDQ. Know him? Two completely unconnected and unrelated sources, one being Amr's log and the other made with a phone call proved there absolutely were communications between the two outside of the SI world. I'm sure some of Amr's members and associates can easily verify. All behavior and activity surrounding the event that took place in 2000, from almost the moment of discovery, pointed straight in that direction as well And motive? Foolish question. What's the motive for 100% of stock market involvement? The entire post exhibits a cornered rat. Message 18320991