Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lucky_girl who wrote (716)	12/14/2004 10:06:18 PM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

why would ya want 72 virgins in the first place? Who has the time to do all that teaching? I'll take my 3 "experienced" girls at a time in this life and be happy with that. and the other board is for information not for the ramblings of some of the pyscotic personalties banned to here. Notice no new info, not many posts? This board seems a perfect spot for the banned dregs to have someone to post to and give the unbanned some entertainment whilst we wait. If one were to make a decision on tony's guilt or innocence by the reports from Carol Remond I personally would not be able to convict on any the charges from the evidence that has been reported. I realize there is much more to the state's case but the defense hasn't even started and Carol has never been known to favor Tony in her writings. She has alwys been very accurate with what she reported about the court proceedings and that hasn't been too pretty for Tony. I think as long as the defense doesn't overplay their case and try to make tony look like an angel, a conviction will be hard to come by. It will certainly be an interesting verdict although you can be assured if he is convicted he has a wonderful reason for an appeal and I believe he would be granted a new trial because the jury has certainly been tainted with the mentioning of the terrorism investigation. That was a foolish move on the part of the state and it shows how desperate they are to try and influence the jury. Just an opinion.......