SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (90680)12/14/2004 11:46:34 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793755
 
Barnett on Ignatius's WaPo Op Ed

washingtonpost.com

COMMENTARY: I don't think a more perfect 783-word description of the book and its impact is possible—right down to his retelling of the story he told at the Highlands Forum about the Central Command briefing by Adm. Nichols to the combatant commander Gen. John Abizaid. What's more impressive to me are the quotes Ignatius uses. Frankly, they are my favorite lines in the book, including the one I used with the BBC today: "None of this can be imposed, only offered. Globalization does not come with a ruler, but with rules." His mentioning of there being no reviews in either the Post or Times is very gratifying, because it labels PNM as a cult hit inside the Pentagon that needs to be read more widely. In all, Ignatius did me one helluva turn here, and I couldn't be more pleased. Especially since I never asked anything from him, despite his comments at the Highlands Forum (in fact, we never spoke one-on-one at the event). So this was his decision, based on his experiences at CENTCOM and his reading of the book. The fact that he ends with a sentence highlighting the "hope" he found in PNM . . . well, that is just icing on this fabulous cake. With a piece like this, it gets harder for people around here to argue that I don't do good things for the military with my writings—even as so many disagree with my vision.



To: LindyBill who wrote (90680)12/15/2004 3:59:54 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793755
 
Not sure the Dems of King County know there is seething anger out in the community. This terrible situation won't stop where they want it to stop....
In addition to finding """""new""""" votes every day, another FUBAR..........

Evidently the Military votes weren't sent on time....don't know how many were sent nor how many returned, but hopefully we will know....



To: LindyBill who wrote (90680)12/15/2004 2:53:06 PM
From: Brian Sullivan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793755
 
Those 567 votes the King county Dems "found" are going to win it for them, IMO. Figure they will be at least 60/40 Dem. Thats another 57 votes for the Dems.

Correct, except that the 60/40 split actually nets the Dems a gain of 113 votes, not 57.

And they still have to get court permission to count these "new" votes but the judges have traditionally been kind to them.