Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (154104)	12/15/2004 2:49:46 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I wrote to Win that i thought the criticism of the allusions to saddam/hitler was in reality a cheap shot at Jewish neocons who are believed by some of the miscreants to be disloyal pro-Israel turncoats who use Hitler as a whipping boy to push their neocon agenda. And i think at the heart of this argument is clear anti-semitism. I am curious as to whether you think i am right. I wrote this as a pm but then i said what the hell. As Bush and then kerry would say "Bring it On".

To: carranza2 who wrote (154104)	12/15/2004 6:37:00 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

But the local Saddam/Hitler bogus analogistics long predates any of that, and none of your references are from this thread. So I continue to find your original statement ridiculous: The whole Hitler thing is not about Saddam or anyone else. Dig a bit and you'll see that it's the result of a semi-concerted online effort to link W with Adolf The "whole Hitler thing" has been going on here a long time, and for the most part, the only thing it's had to do with W is faithful propagandizing for the war he had to have.