SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (4282)12/15/2004 9:03:53 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 7936
 
Downright stupid

I’ve got an idea that would revolutionize the way we do our weekly shopping.

Every few years, we all vote for our favourite supermarket company. The one that gets more votes across the country than any other then gets to deliver our shopping every week to all of us, regardless of whom we voted for. It delivers goods of its own choosing, at prices that it sets. It will make us buy Pedigree Chum even if we don’t have a dog. If we refuse to pay, the supermarket can throw us into prison. And if we try to buy food from other shops, we will still have to pay the winning supermarket.

After a few years, at a time of the supermarket’s choosing, we get to hold another vote. This is the only say we get about the prices we’re charged or the food we get.

Now, this is probably the stupidest idea you’ve ever heard. But it’s exactly how we buy our political services.

So, here’s the question. What are the differences between food and political services that makes my idea a good way of buying political services but a lousy way of buying goods? And what conditions have to hold for this to be the best possible way of buying political services? Do these conditions really exist? Have they ever?

stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com

What If Supermarkets were Run like Schools?

Mark Harrison, Department of Economics, The Faculties Australian National University

fcpp.org

Sticker Shock
One-size-fits-all education is not halal
reason.com



To: TimF who wrote (4282)12/16/2004 7:59:32 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 7936
 
If your going to have extensive human intel, you probably have to deal with lowlifes

The public so often expects to have its cake and eat it, too. We want intel but we find the process for getting it distasteful so we periodically demand that our operatives abide by the same rules one uses in polite society. I agree that it goes in cycles. Intel is like that proverbial sausage--you don't want to watch it being made.