To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (799 ) 12/16/2004 7:48:20 AM From: ravenseye Read Replies (4) | Respond to It must be easy to think what you want. Your thoughts are negated by the personal message I received from the a@p_moderator errr a@p gated community gatekeeper sent 12/11/2004 4:17:18 AM stating "sorry, there's another board for conspiracy theories..." Ironically sent TWENTY MINUTES after my last post on the a@p gated community board, in regards to my message 88713 about "SAME EVANS?" time stamped 12/11/2004 3:57:12 AM. If I was to post my real thoughts, I'd probably be banned from SI because of what those thoughts may imply, meaning I will refrain from sharing all of my thoughts. Who created the A@P Vote username? Get my drift? I'm not here to create trouble. I'm here following a conspiracy trial and why I asked "Same Evans?". The a@p_moderator should know a conspiracy trial does present a lot of theories. Any one who has read stock message boards knows in the past when the a@p gated community moved in on a stock, Evans was often publishing items about the same stocks. Some may think that is a coincidence but I don't. I own one of the stocks and have documented what I perceive to be a planned attack against it, for example on 03/17/2000. There are so many apologists for the actions of others, but when it comes down to facts, peoples thoughts really don't matter. Some could say they think the sky is falling, but it's not. Point remains, Evans has been issued a subpoena by the defense dream team. The defense wants to question that "SAME EVANS" but I was censored in the a@p gated community for posing a question with a link about the "SAME EVANS". The hypocrisy stinks and is a true reflection of the a@p gated community, and it's gatekeeper! Message 13228206 Message 13228257 Message 13228409 Message 13228450 Message 13229476
