Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (154169)	12/16/2004 11:03:32 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

But these recent rumblings on the right would favor escalation, not withdrawal. The problem Bush has is that so far he does not want to admit that anything is seriously wrong with Iraq. Booting Rummy admits that. The other cabinet changes could be attributed to burnout, family, bla bla. Not so with Rummy.

To: michael97123 who wrote (154169)	12/19/2004 3:52:48 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

After Outcry, Rumsfeld Says He Will Sign Condolence Letters washingtonpost.com [ But, as was the case with the NG guy's question, action comes after outcry, not before. Anyway, given Rummy's tightness with the never-changing, never-mistaken war president, he probably comes under W's one true definition of "personal responsibility", where the buck always stops elsewhere. ] By Dana Milbank The Washington Post Sunday, December 19, 2004; Page A05 The Pentagon has acknowledged that Donald H. Rumsfeld did not sign condolence letters to the families of soldiers killed in Iraq, but it said that from now on the embattled defense secretary would stop the use of signing machines and would pick up the pen himself. In a statement provided to Stars and Stripes, the military newspaper, Rumsfeld said: "I wrote and approved the now more than 1,000 letters sent to family members and next of kin of each of the servicemen and women killed in military action. While I have not individually signed each one, in the interest of ensuring expeditious contact with grieving family members, I have directed that in the future I sign each letter." The controversy arose when soldier-turned-writer David H. Hackworth penned a column on Nov. 22 reporting that two Pentagon-based colonels told him that Rumsfeld "has relinquished this sacred duty to a signature device rather than signing the sad documents himself." After checking with various families of the dead, Hackworth wrote that "one father bitterly commented that he thought it was a shame that the SecDef could keep his squash schedule but not find the time to sign his dead son's letter." Hackworth wrote that a Pentagon spokesman, Jim Turner, dutifully told him that "Rumsfeld signs the letters himself." Now, that assertion turns out to be inoperative. This is an unwelcome discovery for Rumsfeld, whose handling of the Iraq war has earned him complaints in recent days from several Republican senators. In particular, Rumsfeld drew criticism for his dismissive treatment of a question from an Iraq-bound soldier about the lack of protective equipment. Stars and Stripes quoted families of the dead saying they were insulted that Rumsfeld did not sign the letters himself. They also said they were suspicious about the signature on similar letters they received from President Bush, but a White House spokesman said Bush does put pen to paper himself.