Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (91663)	12/17/2004 5:18:47 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<<Going to war in Iraq was something he could do to prove his manliness, and so he did. >> I seriously doubt Dubya has any problem with his manliness and I really doubt he went to Iraq to hump his mother. H.W. thought Saddam would be over thrown. Didn't happen, 8 Clinton years happened. 9/11 brought us a brand new world.

To: Grainne who wrote (91663)	12/17/2004 5:58:51 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Like I said - bizarro world. Your notion is ludicrous and your justification for it mere amateur psychobabble. And your attempt to dismiss the many real justifications for going to war to remove Saddam Hussein as some kind of cover for what you claim is the "real" reason - Bush's "desire to possess [his] mother sexually" - is, to put it as kindly as I can, just stupid and offensive. Not you, of course, just your idea and argument. That's permitted, right? "Attack the post, not the poster", right?