Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (26136)	12/17/2004 9:22:56 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Les, my parents are covered on my Dad's health care retirement plan which is excellent so my information about medicare is limited. I don't know if it is still legal to do this, but I do know that some doctors refused to accept medicare patients because their reimbursements were low. So the thing that bothers me about medicare is you don't necessarily have access to the good specialists. That bugs me. You can't even pay the doctor the amount they charge that's above the medicare reimbursement because that's considered illegal, so your access to certain good specialists gets completely cut off. It sounds like your Dad had a high deductible for doctors visits and outpatient care? Regards, Amy J

To: Les H who wrote (26136)	12/17/2004 11:13:06 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Northern Trust weekly report Paul Kasriel [A few snips but one can not appreciate the snips alone. Lots of interesting charts in the attached link. Mish] Relative to our after-tax income, the value of houses, and the ground under them, reached a new record high at 192% in the third quarter (see Chart 1). This escalation in home prices relative to household income finally appears to be having a negative effect on housing affordability. In the two quarters ended Q3:2004, the 30-year mortgage rate increased a minuscule net 29 basis points (based on quarterly averages of interest rates). But in that same period, an index of housing affordability declined by 9.44% (not annualized). Maybe this is why adjustable-rate interest-only mortgages are becoming so popular. Even with relatively low 30-year mortgage rates, many folks are not finding homes affordable given the sharp rise in the value of residential real estate. If the Fed keeps pushing up short-term interest rates, home-price bids might start to soften as housing gets less affordable even if financed with adjustable-rate interest-only mortgages. Back in the late 1990s, when the P/E ratios on corporate equities were climbing to the sky and some of us Chicken Littles were warning that the sky would be falling, we were told that “it’s different this time.” Currently, the P/E ratio on owner-occupied housing is also climbing to the sky, hitting a record high 18.2 in the third quarter. But the “it’s-different-this-time” crowd will point out that a high P/E ratio on housing is to be expected because interest rates are low. But some of us Chicken Littles would point out that in 1965 the 10-year Treasury was trading around its third quarter average of 4.30 and the P/E ratio on housing was only 13.3 vs. today’s 18.2 (see Chart 2). It very well may be different this time – much worse for housing when interest rates climb more. ........................................ Households continue to put a lot of their nest eggs in one basket – their houses. Chart 4 shows that residential real estate represents a record-high 29% of the value of total household assets. Sure hope it pays off for all of us rapidly-aging baby boomers. But as I said a number of commentaries ago, if it doesn’t work out, we will become a nation of bed-and-breakfast proprietors, renting rooms to Chinese and Indian tourists. ....... Now let’s turn to Corporate America. We have some role reversal here. As mentioned above, after decades of being net providers of funds to the rest of the economy, households have now become net demanders of funds. Curiously enough, after decades of being net demanders of funds, nonfinancial corporations have become net providers of funds to the economy. That is, corporations are not spending all of their after-tax after-dividend cash flow on capital equipment and inventories. Although the amount of funds nonfinancial corporations are providing to the economy is small – only $20.3 billion on average in the four quarters ended Q3:2004 – as shown in Chart 8, any positive net financial investment by these corporations is very unusual. What makes it especially unusual is that the cost of capital – be it equity or debt capital – is so low now. This suggests that the expected return on capital in the U.S. might be unusually low now. And enjoy these stocking stuffers over your Christmas and New Year’s holidays. To cheer you up over the holidays, I am going to take a couple of weeks off from writing these dreary commentaries. Aren’t you feeling cheery already? ====================================================================== This is a mandatory read Read the rest here: northerntrust.com