SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RealMuLan who wrote (19013)12/19/2004 10:10:19 PM
From: RealMuLan  Respond to of 116555
 
Act now to cut taxes
New IRS rules affecting year-end strategies

Russ Wiles
The Arizona Republic
Dec. 20, 2004 12:00 AM

If you're looking to buy a car, or get rid of one, changes to the nation's tax code can make it wise to act before Jan. 1.

Two new tax rules relate to autos, trucks, boats and other vehicles. One reduces the deductible value of vehicles that individuals give to charity starting Jan. 1, thus making it smart to donate before year-end if you're so inclined.

The other, more significant rule lets taxpayers deduct either their state and local income taxes or their state and local sales taxes - the first time since the mid-1980s that Uncle Sam has allowed a sales-tax break. advertisement



"It will save some people taxes to have the choice, even in Arizona," said Ellen Campbell, an enrolled-agent tax specialist in Phoenix. "But the obvious winners are people in Florida, Texas and other places with no state income taxes."

While the sales-tax rule isn't geared to vehicles per se, they're the highest-dollar items on which most people pay sales taxes.

Both rules spice up the usual array of year-end tax-planning tips, such as:

• Taking as many deductions as you can before year-end while deferring the receipt of income, if possible, until 2005. This assumes you'll be in the same or a higher tax bracket next year.

As a general rule, all medical expenses can be deducted in Arizona. That differs from federal law, for which medical costs can be written off only to the extent they exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income.

• Donating money or personal property like clothes to charitable groups - one of the easiest ways to compile deductions before year-end.

"Go through your closet and go through your garage," suggests James Darling, a certified public accountant in Tempe. "If you're thinking of giving money to charities, do it before year-end."

• Donating to help Arizona students. The state allows a tax credit of up to $200 for singles or $250 for married couples for donations in support of extracurricular activities at public schools. There's also a credit worth up to $500 for singles and $625 for married couples on donations to organizations that provide scholarships for private-school students. Any credit taken can't exceed the amount of your donation.

• Selling stocks, mutual funds or other investments before year-end. If your losses exceed your gains, you can deduct up to $3,000 in losses each year from ordinary income.

Just be aware that you first must net any losses against gains in calculating year-end tax liabilities, Darling said.

So if you've already locked in long-term gains that will be taxed at a modest 15 percent rate, you might want to delay taking losses until 2005.

"You don't necessarily want to realize losses if it means wiping out your 15 percent gains," he said.

• Avoiding the purchase of mutual funds until after they pay capital-gains distributions. This way, you avoid "buying the dividend" - normally a poor move but a timely caveat since most funds make capital-gains payments in December. This tip doesn't apply if you invest within 401(k) or other sheltered accounts.

As a footnote, some of those year-end tips shouldn't be pursued by people subject to the alternative minimum tax. Items that can trigger the AMT include deductions for state income tax, sales tax and real estate taxes. So can unusually large capital gains.

The vehicle-donation issue carries the most urgency, since the rules will change Jan. 1. Starting then, donors will be able to deduct only the price at which the charity sells their vehicle, rather than the fair market value. Most charities sell donated cars at auctions, at low wholesale prices.

"It's best for donors to do it now," said Jamie Craig Dove, development director for the Arizona Kidney Foundation, which operates one of the biggest and oldest donation programs in the state.

The new provision, which applies to donations above $500, threatens to cut into future vehicle gifting, which some charities rely on as a key source of revenue.

"We're not pretending this will be a non-issue," Dove said. "But the people who are committed to the Arizona Kidney Foundation will continue to donate cars anyway."

The charity generates about $600,000, roughly one-fifth its annual budget, from vehicle donations. Proceeds pay for dialysis, transplants and other assistance for needy patients.

The sales-tax break is perhaps the main new provision affecting individuals this year. It applies in both 2004 and 2005, yet it's available only to taxpayers who itemize, or separately list, deductions. About 45 percent of Arizonans itemize.

If you choose to deduct sales taxes, you can rely on IRS tables that estimate tax outlays for people in various states, income ranges and exemption categories. The tables are listed in Publication 600, which can be viewed at www.irs.gov. The IRS will send the brochure early next year to taxpayers who normally receive a Form 1040 package.

If you buy a car or other big-ticket item, you can still add the taxes from those purchases to your table amounts to calculate the overall sales-tax deduction.

Arizonans paid $1,013 in state income taxes on average in 2002, reports the Department of Revenue. That provides a rough comparison for anyone considering the sales-tax option.

Reach the reporter at russ.wiles@arizonarepublic.com or (602) 444-8616.
azcentral.com



To: RealMuLan who wrote (19013)12/19/2004 10:50:01 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Bush going to raise taxes?
Social Security reform ‘could hit high earners'
By Andrew Balls in Washington
Published: December 19 2004 21:01
Bush administration officials on Sunday refused to rule out the possibility that high-income earners would be required to make larger payroll tax contributions as part of Social Security reform.

John Snow, Treasury secretary, (pictured) left the door open to an increase in the payroll tax base in an interview on Fox News. “We don't have a detailed plan yet,” he said. “What the president said was no increase in rates.” Andrew Card, White House chief of staff, said President George W. Bush did not want to see the payroll tax rate increase but refused to comment on the tax base.

The payroll tax, which funds Social Security, is levied at a 12.4 per cent rate on the first $87,900 (€66,000, £45,243) of annual employment earnings. Raising the threshold above that level would increase the tax payments made by higher earners.

Congressional Republicans, including senator Lindsey Graham and congressman Jim Kolbe, have called for a significant increase in the payroll tax maximum to help reform the pensions system.

They have raised concerns over the fiscal probity of issuing $6,000bn of extra government debt over the next 20 years to pay the transition costs of introducing personal accounts as part of Social Security.

Federal Reserve members, including Alan Greenspan, the Fed chairman, and Edward Gramlich, a Fed governor, have also indicated their concern about Social Security reform involving the issue of a large amount of government debt.

Mr Bush has said he favours Social Security reform. But last week's White House economic summit provided no further details of his plan. The leading proposal from the 2001 presidential commission on Social Security reform highlighted in this year's Economic Report of the President is generally seen as the administration's template.

It would cut future benefits for younger workers by changing the formula used to calculate entitlements and would allow workers to divert a third of their payroll tax into a private account invested in equity and corporate bond index funds or in Treasuries.

Because Social Security would continue to pay the current level of benefits to those in or near retirement, that would create a hole in the system's accounts in the coming decades, increasing the government's debt by more than $6,000bn in the first 20 years, according to the Social Security administration's calculations. It would not lead to a reduction in government debt relative to the projections under current law for 60 years.

The Social Security trustees forecast that the system has a shortfall of $3,700bn over the next 75 years in net present value terms, rising beyond 2080.

Democrats have pointed out that the revenue that will be lost by making permanent the first term Bush tax cuts exceed Social Security's funding gap. The White House has made clear that extending those tax cuts, which are about to expire, is the administration's priority.

Mr Gramlich, who chaired a commission on Social Security reform during the 1990s, expressed concern at the administration's favoured approach in a recent interview.

“At a time when national savings is dangerously low, does it make sense to add hugely to government borrowing? Wouldn't it be safer to pay for individual accounts up front?” he said. “Some argue that we have this liability already, but that implicit liability can be roughly cut in half by a sensible measure such as gradually increasing the retirement age”.

Mr Greenspan has suggested that investors are likely to see the issuance of Treasury bonds as very different to the contingent liabilities represented by forecast Social Security benefits. His views were expressed in testimony given to Congress in November 1997 before the Senate budget committee.

“If markets have not fully accounted for this implicit liability, then making it explicit could lead to higher interest rates for US government debt,” he said.

news.ft.com