SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (69187)12/20/2004 11:37:53 AM
From: redfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
A GRUBBY LITTLE WITCH HUNT

by Andrew Gumbel

The battle over revisionist Christian history in Cupertino bodes ill for the nation

If you haven’t spent the past couple of weeks tuned into right-wing talk radio and Fox News, you might not have heard of Stephen Williams. Out there in the land of Rush and Sean Hannity, though, he has already been enshrined as a folk hero of the triumphant new right, a saint and perhaps also a martyr.

Williams is a fifth grade teacher in Silicon Valley and practicing Christian who fell foul of his school principal because he was overeager to emphasize the religious beliefs of the Founding Fathers in his history classes. So far, so banal. He wasn’t suspended or fired. The principal at Stevens Creek Elementary School in Cupertino simply became a little alarmed when Williams distributed a handout entitled “What Great Leaders Have Said About The Bible,” which quoted a handful of Republican presidents (all pro!) alongside Jesus himself. She became more alarmed still when he asked his class to read a chunk of St. Luke’s Gospel to help them understand the meaning of Easter. So, at the end of the last school year, she asked him to submit his lesson plans to her in advance to make sure his classes didn’t violate the separation of church and state.

When Williams edited down the Declaration of Independence to include only its references to a higher being, or when he reproduced chunks of George Washington’s prayer journal to the exclusion of the Father of the Nation’s more obviously political reflections, the principal drew the line and told him to take the discussion in a different direction.

There the affair might have ended had it not been for Williams’s friends in a Phoenix-based fundamentalist Christian outfit called the Alliance Defense Fund, who persuaded him that what was going on was a brazen attempt by Left Coast liberal heathens to airbrush God out of the public arena altogether. The ADF started spreading stories that he was the victim of an out-of-control principal who was as allergic to religious references as vampires are to garlic and rosewater. And they bankrolled a federal lawsuit against the school district, filed last month, in which Williams alleged that his First Amendment and other constitutional rights were violated.

“Declaration of Independence Banned From Classroom” read a hysterical headline on the ADF website on the day the suit was filed. Soon the line was being pounded like a drum all over the right-wing airwaves, and made it, unqualified, into the headline of a Reuters news wire dispatch. Principal Patricia Vidmar, listeners and viewers were told, couldn’t stomach the nation’s original founding document because of its mentions of Nature’s God, the Creator, and Divine Providence. “What has America become if these words no longer have the meaning for us that they have had for our parents and their parents before them?” huffed Sean Hannity on Fox News. “When these words of Thomas Jefferson fall on deaf ears, where are we?”

Hannity returned to the story again and again as though the very fate of the Republic depended on it. He even moved his show to Cupertino for one night last week and renamed it “Take Back America” to ram home the point. He continued to voice his indignation even after Williams, the star guest on the Cupertino broadcast, admitted to him that, er, actually, the story about the Declaration of Independence being banned wasn’t true. Hannity, of course, has never been one to let the facts get in the way of a good rant, and the following night he was back at it. “I think this is a pivotal moment for this country,” he thundered.

Clearly, thousands of evangelical Christians agree, because they have been bombarding Stevens Creek Elementary with e-mails, faxes, and letters. One man told the school: “We hope you burn in hell.” Another, purporting to be a concerned local resident, wrote to the school board urging them to give Principal Vidmar a psychiatric evaluation. Another Christian-right footsoldier called a teacher at home at 1:30 in the morning and said: “I know who you are, where you live, and that you work for that godforsaken school.”

The point here is not whether Stephen Williams or Patricia Vidmar overstepped a professional boundary. The debate hasn’t gotten anywhere near sophisticated enough to address that question. The point is that the frenzy whipped up on Williams’s behalf portends an ugly battle whose implications stretch far beyond Cupertino. Having gained unprecedented access to the corridors of national power, the Christian right is now setting its sights on tearing down two centuries of secular tradition, starting with the very foundation of American society, its public school system.

This is no idle threat. The backers of the Alliance Defense Fund include James Dobson, a Bush family confidant and head of Focus on the Family, which believes gay marriage will “destroy the Earth” and has already set about eviscerating the once highly regarded public schools in Colorado Springs, where it is based. They also include Don Wildmon of the American Family Association, who wants to put “In God We Trust” posters in every public school, and James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Ministries, who agrees with John Ashcroft that America’s only King is Jesus. “The time has come,” Kennedy has said, “and it is long overdue, when Christians and conservatives and all men and women who believe in the birthright of freedom must rise up and reclaim America for Jesus Christ.”

All that puts the debate about the religiosity of the Founding Fathers in rather chilling perspective. It’s ludicrous to argue, as the evangelicals do, that because most of the Framers of the Constitution were practicing Christians, they never had any intention to create a separation of church and state. First off, the argument is historically bogus. The Framers knew they could never knit a Republic together if they imposed a single Protestant religion on the heterodox believers of the 13 former colonies. They also knew that European settlers had crossed the Atlantic precisely to be able to practice their individual religions without state interference. The whole doctrine of the separation of powers was based, in part, on historical memories of a Europe oppressed by the established church.

Secularism is also a tradition that has deepened over time. Even if someone now wants to point to some of the Founders and question their secularist credentials, so what? Most of the Founders were also deeply skeptical, if not outright hostile, to the notion of representative democracy. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts called it “the worst of all political evils.” But nobody is – yet – suggesting that voting is un-American.

Forget any pretense at real debate. The showdown in Cupertino is a grubby little witch-hunt in which purported defenders of the Constitution are doing everything they can to rip the constitutional fabric of the country and trump secular pluralism with fundamentalist theocracy. That tendency has always been part of the American political landscape, of course, going back to the evangelical revivals of the early 19th Century. The difference now is that the religious extremists have money, power, plentiful access to the broadcast airwaves, and a president who echoes many of their beliefs. We should all be deeply unnerved.

lacitybeat.com



To: longnshort who wrote (69187)12/20/2004 11:50:53 AM
From: redfish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
I set this page up to bring more attention to this issue at Stevens Creek Elementary school in Cupertino, CA (an affluent city in Silicon Valley), following the lead of Dave Johnson at Seeing the Forest who brought it to my attention. Since then I have contacted a source who provided me additional details.

SUMMARY

A quick review of the lawsuit and the media brouhaha instigated by Stephen Williams' supporters indicates that this has all the makings of a typical right-wing hit job: a frivolous lawsuit, false propaganda (by the plaintiffs and the media) and intimidation/character assassination [No offense is intended here to conservatives in general, I am really referring to the right-wing media and Far Right here. There are genuinely concerned (and staunch) conservatives who don't approve of this lawsuit or the Far Right's/media's behavior - and who support Principal Vidmar. Please take a moment to click here for more on this].

The school and its staff (especially Principal Vidmar) have been deluged with scores of nasty emails and phone calls including hostile comments such as "We hope you burn in hell". Another call was made to one of the teachers on 12/9/04 at 1:30 am saying "I know who you are, where you live and that you work for that godforsaken school." This kind of intimidation is making it very difficult for parents or teachers to speak out publicly against the nastiness and false claims behind the lawsuit. [I have therefore posted a special request on Dailykos asking people to take action, by including the text of a letter I wrote to the CUSD Superintendent and Board].

The reality here is that the teaching material of Mr. Williams is unbelievably slanted towards promoting God, religion and Christianity ("Christian nation" propaganda) while leaving out easily available, copious amounts of material that contradict the picture he was trying to provide the students. Some of his teaching supplements were even found to be bogus or dubious in origin [see some examples in Exhibit E and Exhibit G]. It shows a complete disregard for providing young students a well rounded perspective on what the founders of the United States really thought, not just about God or religion, but also about how God or religion should interact with the business of Government. It tells me that the principal may indeed have had good justification for doing what she did.

Let me add a clarification in response to some emails I received. The objective of this page is not to claim that the Founding Fathers of the United States were irreligious or had no faith in Christianity (even though there are quotations presented here that gives the impression that some of them might have been that way). Indeed, if we set aside some of the prominent Founding Fathers, there is a fair amount of evidence that Americans from that era tended to more religious than not - although they craved for freedom of religion, which was one of the reasons many of the migrants came to this country. However, in terms of the Founding Fathers themselves, the real issue we are dealing with in this incident is not whether they were devout Christians but whether they believed religion or church needed to be an integral part of the Government of the United States. The issue is also not whether John Adams or Abraham Lincoln or any of the others that Mr. Williams quoted were religious - it is whether they were blindly religious in the manner portrayed by Mr. Williams in his "supplements".

[Note: The lawsuit has a fair number of documents. I have reviewed most of them and the details of that review were used to compile the summary (above). The review is available (below) starting here; to contact the media to ask them to provide the real facts on this story please go to section 6].

On another serious note, this episode demonstrates yet again why much of the media in this country is not liberal by any means, but is rather driven to report a "he-said she-said" perspective with little independent fact checking. The right-wing media, as usual, is openly dishonest and fraudulent (as I have summarized in Appendix A). Dave has chronicled this in this update (edited on 12/6/04 to include a correction in Dave's post):

The New York Times, in God, American History and a Fifth-Grade Class, writes today about the Thanksgiving-week "Declaration of Independence Banned" story. They cover the story in a he-said/she-said manner, saying the teacher's contrived lawsuit,

"...has single-handedly turned the Declaration of Independence into a powerful tool for the Christian right in its battle against secularist teaching of colonial history..."

The Times story does not even mention that the controversy -- the reason they are covering the story at all -- only exists because of the inflammatory claim that the Declaration of Independence was banned by the school because it contained the word 'God,' and does not refute this outright lie beyond one "he said" statement. The school had not banned the Declaration of Independence, it had asked a teacher to stop giving unconstitutional "supplemental handouts" (like this, perhaps?) to students.

The original story surfaced in the Right's echo chamber (Drudge, Limbaugh, Fox...) the day before Thanksgiving -- carefully timed to make it impossible to refute for several days, and to stir up emotions at family dinnertables. Now the story is widespread, which is probably the reason the Times addressed it at all. A Google search of "Declaration of Independence banned" yields 17,200 citations. (That is a search of the text in quotes, not for sites containing some mix of the words.)

The Alliance Defense Fund, the "Christian law" organization responsible for the lawsuit states on their website that they use "strategy and coordination" to advance their mission to "spread of the Gospel." In this case their agitprop strategy of bearing false witness to provoke argument and division has proven successful. This lie is being repeated by blogs, discussion forums and word-of-mouth "water cooler" conversations. And the intended culture-war response is evoked in the thinking of the public: they are "fed up" with "politically correct" "domestic enemies" who are taking the separation of church and state "too far."

Professional journalism again fails us. As far as I know, no "journalists" have seriously looked into the outrageous claim that a school banned the Declaration of Independence because it contains the word 'God', even though it is a major topic of discussion across the country, after Reuters allowed itself to be used to publicize and bring mainstream credibility to the lie.

Evidence backing up my summary is shown below - grouped in a few sections (some of the links to other commentary on the web are from Dave). Please peruse through the sections and then help the Principal and correct the false stories in the media by going to Section 6.

eriposte.com



To: longnshort who wrote (69187)12/20/2004 12:01:09 PM
From: redfish  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 89467
 
Do you believe it is appropriate for a history or math teacher at a public elementary school to refer to Jesus "hundreds of times a day"?

I think the bastard should be fired ... he is there to teach the kids math and history, not to preach to them.

A lot of the stuff he gave the kids wasn't even factually accurate ... quotations that were fabricated, and letters allegedly written by Washington that he never wrote.

Have you wingnuts no shame?