SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (14156)12/20/2004 3:32:31 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Stockbroker Accused of Stealing $4.1 Mln
Fri Dec 17, 2004 05:35 PM ET

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York stockbroker was indicted on Friday on charges of stealing more than $4.1 million from three Wall Street firms, prosecutors said.
Calvin Darden Jr., 30, of Glen Cove, New York, who worked as a stockbroker at Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney, Wachovia Securities and AIC Ltd., faces charges of grand larceny, criminal possession of stolen property, falsifying business records and scheming to defraud.

The indictment accuses Darden of fraudulently inducing Smith Barney in 2001 to hire him and give him a loan of $344,000 based on his alleged prior lucrative client list, according to the office of Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau.

It was revealed the list was altered and fabricated, prosecutors said.

Two years later, Darden misrepresented the records of his clients' assets and induced Wachovia Securities to give him a loan of more than $600,000, according to prosecutors.

Six months later, he used phony documents claiming he had a $1.2 billion book of business with clients that included Hollywood celebrities and professional sports stars and obtained a loan of almost $3.2 million from AIC Ltd., a Canadian mutual fund firm, prosecutors said.

Darden was arraigned before Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Brenda Soloff, who gave him until Tuesday to post $1 million cash bail or bond.

He faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted of the top count of first-degree grand larceny.

Civil suits against Darden were filed earlier this year by AIC and Wachovia accusing him of not repaying his outstanding loans.

© Reuters 2004. All Rights Reserved.



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (14156)12/21/2004 3:56:03 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Only $5,000 civil penalties for PennyKings PANAMED CORPORATIOM

==========================================================

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND CIVIL PENALTIES ASSESSED AGAINST PANAMED CORPORATIOM

The Commission announced that in a hearing on December 13 the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of California entered a Final
Judgment against Defendant PanaMed Corp., based on the Consent to
Injunction Judgment and Order entered by Judge Robert J. Kelleher on
Sept. 24, 2004 and the SEC's Motion for Summary Judgment filed on Nov.
4, 2004. PanaMed issued press releases, memoranda and other materials
which were disseminated to investors in a private offering of PanaMed
stock and which contained false and misleading statements. In addition,
PanaMed failed to timely file numerous mandatory periodic reports with
the Commission and failed to file its most recent annual report.

PanaMed, without admitting or denying the allegations of the complaint,
consented in September to an order of permanent injunction which
permanently restrained and enjoined it from violating, directly or
indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated
thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) [15 U.S.C. § 78m(a)] and Rules 13a-1
and 13a-13 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.13a-1 and 240.13a-13]
and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)]. Based on
the consent and the Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court then ordered
on Dec. 13, 2004 that PanaMed pay civil penalties in the amount of
$5,000 for the violations it had previously consented to. [SEC v.
PanaMed Corp., Civil Action No. CV-03-5513-RJICFMOx ] (LR-19003)



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (14156)12/22/2004 12:08:03 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Watch Francis Gaskins (Research Analyst & Editor of IPO
Desktop.com) Interview Absolute Health and Fitness CEO
Brian Morris & Vice President Thomas Flynn.

junkfax.org



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (14156)12/22/2004 12:56:18 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
"The Court ordered disgorgement and prejudgment interest against Wooten in the amount of $499,071, but waived payment due to Wooten's demonstrated inability to pay, and did not impose a civil penalty. The Court ordered disgorgement and prejudgment interest against McKittrick, but waived payment of all but $165,918 due to his demonstrated inability to pay, and did not impose a civil penalty. Southern, Wooten and McKittrick consented to the entries of the judgments without admitting or denying any of the allegations of the Commission's Complaint."

"The Commission's Complaint alleged that defendants McKittrick, Gerald F. Hunter, Jr., Southern and Wooten raised at least $25 million through a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of short-term notes on behalf of UC Properties LLC. The Complaint alleged that the defendants operated these note offerings as a Ponzi scheme, using funds raised from current note offerings to pay principal and interest to investors in prior offerings, and that at least $5 million was transferred to relief defendant Springdale Investments, Inc. The Complaint further alleged that Southern operated in violation of the net capital rule since at least October 2001, and that the firm's FOCUS reports and other books and records have been inaccurate since that time."

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 19009 / December 22, 2004
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Southern Financial Group, Inc., Richard M. Wooten, Charles Dennis McKittrick and Gerald F. Hunter, Jr.,United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, Civil Action File No. 2:02-1806-18
Federal Judge Permanently Enjoins Southern Financial Group, Inc., Richard M. Wooten and Charles Dennis McKittrick
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that the Honorable David C. Norton, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, entered Final Judgments as to Defendants Southern Financial Group, Inc. (Southern), Richard M. Wooten (Wooten) and Charles Dennis McKittrick (McKittrick). Southern was enjoined from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), Sections 10(b), 15(c)(3) and 17(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rules 10b-5, 15c3-1, 15c3-3, 17a-3, 17a-5 and 17a-11 thereunder. Wooten and McKittrick were enjoined from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and from aiding and abetting violations of Sections 15(c)(3) and 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rules 15c3-1, 15c3-3, 17a-3, 17a-5 and 17a-11 thereunder.

The Court ordered disgorgement and prejudgment interest against Wooten in the amount of $499,071, but waived payment due to Wooten's demonstrated inability to pay, and did not impose a civil penalty. The Court ordered disgorgement and prejudgment interest against McKittrick, but waived payment of all but $165,918 due to his demonstrated inability to pay, and did not impose a civil penalty. Southern, Wooten and McKittrick consented to the entries of the judgments without admitting or denying any of the allegations of the Commission's Complaint.

The Commission's Complaint alleged that defendants McKittrick, Gerald F. Hunter, Jr., Southern and Wooten raised at least $25 million through a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of short-term notes on behalf of UC Properties LLC. The Complaint alleged that the defendants operated these note offerings as a Ponzi scheme, using funds raised from current note offerings to pay principal and interest to investors in prior offerings, and that at least $5 million was transferred to relief defendant Springdale Investments, Inc. The Complaint further alleged that Southern operated in violation of the net capital rule since at least October 2001, and that the firm's FOCUS reports and other books and records have been inaccurate since that time.

See also: L.R. 17535 (May 28, 2002); L.R. 17569 (June 17, 2002); and L.R. 17574 (June 19, 2002).

sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 12/22/2004



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (14156)12/22/2004 1:02:16 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
"In the December 6, 2004 final judgment, the Honorable Mary M. Lisi ordered that Ullom is liable for disgorgement of $190,000, representing profits gained by Ullom, together with prejudgment interest in the amount of $49,309.75, for a total of $239,309.75. Based on Ullom's sworn representations and other documents and information submitted to the Commission, however, the Court waived payment of all but $10,000 of the disgorgement and prejudgment interest. According to the final judgment, the Court's determination to waive payment of all but $10,000 is contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of Ullom's financial statements."

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 19010 / December 22, 2004
SEC v. Dennis Herula et al., (United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, C.A. No. 02 154 ML, filed April 1, 2002)
Court Enters Final Judgment by Consent Against Relief Defendant David L. Ullom
The Commission announced that, on December 6, 2004, a Rhode Island federal court entered a final judgment by consent against David L. Ullom, a relief defendant in a civil injunctive action filed by the Commission in April 2002, in connection with an alleged fraudulent scheme that raised at least $52 million from investors. The Commission named Ullom as a relief defendant in its complaint. The complaint alleges that Ullom received approximately $190,000 in investor funds to which he has no legitimate claim.

The Commission alleges in its complaint that individuals associated with an entity formerly known as Brite Business made fraudulent representations to investors, promising exorbitant returns through a high yield trading program. According to the Commission's complaint, most of the Brite Business investor funds were maintained in a brokerage account at the Cranston, Rhode Island office of Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. The complaint alleges that at all relevant times, Ullom was the branch office manager of Raymond James's Cranston office, and Dennis Herula was both a registered representative at the Cranston office of Raymond James and was the designated representative for the Brite Business account. The complaint further alleges that, between 1999 and 2001, Herula and others associated with Brite Business misappropriated, transferred or lost approximately $20 million in investor funds. According to the Commission's complaint, Ullom received $190,000 in Brite Business investor funds to which he was not entitled and for which he performed no services. The Commission alleges that those funds should be returned to investors. On July 17, 2002, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order freezing $190,000 of Ullom's assets, based on its finding that the Commission was likely to succeed in proving that Ullom has no legitimate claim to those funds.

In the December 6, 2004 final judgment, the Honorable Mary M. Lisi ordered that Ullom is liable for disgorgement of $190,000, representing profits gained by Ullom, together with prejudgment interest in the amount of $49,309.75, for a total of $239,309.75. Based on Ullom's sworn representations and other documents and information submitted to the Commission, however, the Court waived payment of all but $10,000 of the disgorgement and prejudgment interest. According to the final judgment, the Court's determination to waive payment of all but $10,000 is contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of Ullom's financial statements.

For further information, please see, Litigation Release No. 17633 (July 26, 2002) [$190,000 asset freeze as to Ullom]; Litigation Release No. 17514 (May 13, 2002) [asset freeze as to Ullom and preliminary injunction order and asset freeze as to certain defendants]; Litigation Release No. 17461 (April 5, 2002) [asset freeze as to Ullom and temporary restraining order and asset freeze as to certain defendants].

sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 12/22/2004



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (14156)12/22/2004 1:17:46 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Watch Francis Gaskins (Research Analyst
& Editor of IPO Desktop.com) Interview Absolute Health and Fitness CEO . junkfax.org



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (14156)12/22/2004 1:42:40 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Francis Gaskins Concorde America stock promoter news.google.com

Has had a long relationship with spammer Bryan Kos