SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (154556)12/21/2004 9:16:12 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Love the caps.



To: RMF who wrote (154556)12/21/2004 10:03:45 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 281500
 
This Administration is doing that for which there was no political support in the past. Prior restraint was as much deference to political fact as it was an assessment of operational risks, perhaps more so. And Iraq was an ongoing problem that had to be resolved. We could not afford to abandon sanctions, but they were full of holes, and there was a gave risk that Saddam would regain a free hand in Iraq. We could not afford that, so we acted, quite rightly.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News