Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57418)	12/21/2004 11:29:27 PM
From: Hugh A	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 74559

Hi Ray: I may be the only Canadian supporter of dubya - a man of action. How many did Clinton kill in Rwanda? Here's a little tidbit for you from the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, "A final concern related to the ongoing rise in the air's CO2 concentration is the worry that it may lead to catastrophic global warming. There is little reason to believe that such will ever occur, however, for several observations of historical changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration and air temperature suggest that it is climate change that drives changes in the air's CO2 content and not vice versa." co2science.org Follow the money to find out who is profiting from the GWI. HA GWI - global warming industry

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (57418)	12/22/2004 4:38:15 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

<George Bush has a much more straightforward solution to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. His plan is to disregard it. That's a hell of a lot cheaper than pioneering an entirely novel technology to solve something that the energy industry is in near complete denial about.> King George II is quite right to ignore C02 emissions. They are good. My wonderful invention was a just-in-case idea, should there really be a problem. I wanted to see what it would cost to solve the possible problem and how it could be done. Another fun method is to freeze CO2 and stack it into mountains. If an ice-age threatened, the covers could be taken off and the CO2 ablated to keep us warm via a greenhouse effect. I thought having it alive in the ecosphere was a better solution - the oceanic ecosphere would boost fish, which is yummy stuff. I looked for the liquid CO2 at 20,000 leagues BOE scientific analysis I did back in 1987, but couldn't find it. But I'm pretty sure my numbers are right. Mqurice