Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Noel de Leon who wrote (154646)	12/22/2004 2:30:42 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Re: "I was pointing out the lack of logic in your coupling of unAmerican to Clinton's responses. "Clinton's reply against her was downright UnAmerican" No, that is NOT what you said...and where on earth do you think you found a lack of logic, anyway? That many Americans, like everyone else, sometimes lie, doesn't mean lying about someone's truthfulness isn't UnAmerican. I certainly can fairly consider it so, thank-you, given what the Constitution is all about. RE: "By the way you might want to document where in the Constitution politicians(or presidents) are prohibited from lying." Who said it made specific reference, anyway? Not me, therefore the only document I need is the constitution itself, because those who take an oath to uphold it are required NOT to trample the rights of citizens. Being honest, as the many women in Clintons life finally were, is an obvious common sense example of exercising the individual right to honest speech (somthing a President, of all people, shouldn't malign). Again, if you don't understand this, then you don't understand what is in the Constitution nor why Public Officials are required to take an oath to it. Dan B.